Top 100 Countries by Automotive Imports (Value), 2025
Automotive Import Markets Ranked by Trade Value
This ranking compares countries by the value of imported automotive goods. The metric uses HS chapter 87, which covers vehicles other than railway or tramway rolling stock, plus parts and accessories. Values are shown in current US dollars and rounded to billions.
The 2025 ranking uses the latest complete annual merchandise trade data available across major reporters, primarily 2024. Full-year 2025 trade records are not yet uniformly available for all countries, so the table avoids mixing complete annual data with partial-year records. A high import value can reflect a large consumer market, strong purchasing power, re-export activity, assembly supply chains, imported parts or premium vehicle demand.
Why automotive import value differs from car sales
Automotive import value is not a simple measure of how many cars a country buys. HS 87 combines passenger cars, trucks, tractors, buses, motorcycles, trailers, bodies, chassis and motor-vehicle parts. That makes it useful for understanding the scale of automotive trade exposure, but it also means that large manufacturing economies can rank highly because they import parts for assembly, not only finished vehicles.
The United States leads the ranking because it combines a very large consumer vehicle market with deep cross-border supply chains in North America.
The total is based on rounded HS 87 import estimates in current US dollars, using 2024 data as the 2025 snapshot baseline.
The upper tier is dominated by large advanced markets and trade hubs, where both finished vehicles and components move at scale.
Import value changes with prices, exchange rates and product mix. It does not directly measure the number of vehicles imported.
Why the United States and Europe dominate the top tier
The Top 10 is concentrated in North America, Western Europe and East Asia. The United States stands apart because of the scale of its vehicle market and its integration with Mexico and Canada. Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands show the weight of Europe’s internal vehicle trade, logistics networks and component flows. China remains a large automotive importer despite being a major producer, because the value measure includes specialised parts, premium vehicles and cross-border supply inputs.
Several countries near the top are not simply end-consumer markets. Belgium and the Netherlands, for example, benefit from ports, distribution platforms and re-export roles. Mexico ranks highly because automotive production is deeply integrated with North American supply chains. This is why the ranking should be read as a trade-flow indicator, not as a direct ranking of car ownership or domestic sales.
Large end-market demand plus high-value imports from Mexico, Canada, Japan, Korea and Europe.
Major automotive producer with extensive parts, premium vehicle and intra-European supply-chain imports.
Deeply linked to the US market through finished vehicles, components and assembly trade.
High purchasing power, premium vehicle demand and continued European and global sourcing.
Large domestic market and dense intra-European trade in vehicles and components.
Domestic production is huge, but specialised components and premium vehicle imports keep value high.
Short table: Top 20 automotive importers
| Rank | Country | Region | Import value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | Americas | $383.5bn |
| 2 | Germany | Europe | $95.4bn |
| 3 | Canada | Americas | $92.8bn |
| 4 | United Kingdom | Europe | $84.5bn |
| 5 | France | Europe | $78.8bn |
| 6 | China | Asia | $72.6bn |
| 7 | Belgium | Europe | $69.2bn |
| 8 | Mexico | Americas | $61.7bn |
| 9 | Netherlands | Europe | $57.6bn |
| 10 | Spain | Europe | $55.8bn |
| 11 | Italy | Europe | $51.4bn |
| 12 | Poland | Europe | $47.5bn |
| 13 | Australia | Oceania | $41.2bn |
| 14 | Saudi Arabia | Middle East | $40.1bn |
| 15 | Japan | Asia | $38.4bn |
| 16 | Czechia | Europe | $36.9bn |
| 17 | Austria | Europe | $32.1bn |
| 18 | United Arab Emirates | Middle East | $31.8bn |
| 19 | Switzerland | Europe | $30.5bn |
| 20 | Sweden | Europe | $29.7bn |
Full ranking table: Top 100 countries by automotive imports value
The table lists 100 countries by rounded estimated automotive import value under HS 87. Values are shown to one decimal place in billions of current US dollars. Countries can be searched by name and filtered by region.
| Rank | Country | Region | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | Americas | $383.5bn |
| 2 | Germany | Europe | $95.4bn |
| 3 | Canada | Americas | $92.8bn |
| 4 | United Kingdom | Europe | $84.5bn |
| 5 | France | Europe | $78.8bn |
| 6 | China | Asia | $72.6bn |
| 7 | Belgium | Europe | $69.2bn |
| 8 | Mexico | Americas | $61.7bn |
| 9 | Netherlands | Europe | $57.6bn |
| 10 | Spain | Europe | $55.8bn |
| 11 | Italy | Europe | $51.4bn |
| 12 | Poland | Europe | $47.5bn |
| 13 | Australia | Oceania | $41.2bn |
| 14 | Saudi Arabia | Middle East | $40.1bn |
| 15 | Japan | Asia | $38.4bn |
| 16 | Czechia | Europe | $36.9bn |
| 17 | Austria | Europe | $32.1bn |
| 18 | United Arab Emirates | Middle East | $31.8bn |
| 19 | Switzerland | Europe | $30.5bn |
| 20 | Sweden | Europe | $29.7bn |
| 21 | South Korea | Asia | $28.6bn |
| 22 | Türkiye | Europe | $28.4bn |
| 23 | Thailand | Asia | $25.8bn |
| 24 | India | Asia | $25.1bn |
| 25 | Hungary | Europe | $24.7bn |
| 26 | Slovakia | Europe | $24.3bn |
| 27 | Romania | Europe | $22.5bn |
| 28 | Brazil | Americas | $22.0bn |
| 29 | Norway | Europe | $21.7bn |
| 30 | Denmark | Europe | $20.4bn |
| 31 | Portugal | Europe | $19.0bn |
| 32 | Malaysia | Asia | $18.8bn |
| 33 | Indonesia | Asia | $18.6bn |
| 34 | Chile | Americas | $17.5bn |
| 35 | South Africa | Africa | $17.3bn |
| 36 | Singapore | Asia | $16.8bn |
| 37 | Vietnam | Asia | $16.5bn |
| 38 | Argentina | Americas | $15.9bn |
| 39 | Israel | Middle East | $15.3bn |
| 40 | Greece | Europe | $14.8bn |
| 41 | Ireland | Europe | $14.2bn |
| 42 | Morocco | Africa | $13.9bn |
| 43 | New Zealand | Oceania | $13.3bn |
| 44 | Finland | Europe | $13.1bn |
| 45 | Slovenia | Europe | $12.6bn |
| 46 | Colombia | Americas | $12.4bn |
| 47 | Egypt | Africa | $12.1bn |
| 48 | Kuwait | Middle East | $11.8bn |
| 49 | Philippines | Asia | $11.6bn |
| 50 | Qatar | Middle East | $11.2bn |
| 51 | Peru | Americas | $10.9bn |
| 52 | Algeria | Africa | $10.7bn |
| 53 | Kazakhstan | Asia | $10.4bn |
| 54 | Oman | Middle East | $9.9bn |
| 55 | Bulgaria | Europe | $9.7bn |
| 56 | Croatia | Europe | $9.4bn |
| 57 | Luxembourg | Europe | $9.1bn |
| 58 | Pakistan | Asia | $8.9bn |
| 59 | Serbia | Europe | $8.6bn |
| 60 | Ukraine | Europe | $7.6bn |
| 61 | Tunisia | Africa | $7.4bn |
| 62 | Bangladesh | Asia | $7.2bn |
| 63 | Dominican Republic | Americas | $7.0bn |
| 64 | Iraq | Middle East | $6.8bn |
| 65 | Ecuador | Americas | $6.6bn |
| 66 | Costa Rica | Americas | $6.3bn |
| 67 | Panama | Americas | $6.1bn |
| 68 | Guatemala | Americas | $5.9bn |
| 69 | Lithuania | Europe | $5.7bn |
| 70 | Azerbaijan | Asia | $5.5bn |
| 71 | Belarus | Europe | $5.3bn |
| 72 | Uruguay | Americas | $5.1bn |
| 73 | Kenya | Africa | $4.9bn |
| 74 | Sri Lanka | Asia | $4.7bn |
| 75 | Jordan | Middle East | $4.5bn |
| 76 | Cyprus | Europe | $4.3bn |
| 77 | Myanmar | Asia | $4.1bn |
| 78 | Uzbekistan | Asia | $4.0bn |
| 79 | Paraguay | Americas | $3.9bn |
| 80 | Lebanon | Middle East | $3.8bn |
| 81 | Bolivia | Americas | $3.7bn |
| 82 | Côte d’Ivoire | Africa | $3.6bn |
| 83 | Ghana | Africa | $3.5bn |
| 84 | Latvia | Europe | $3.4bn |
| 85 | Estonia | Europe | $3.3bn |
| 86 | Iceland | Europe | $3.2bn |
| 87 | Cambodia | Asia | $3.1bn |
| 88 | El Salvador | Americas | $3.0bn |
| 89 | Honduras | Americas | $2.9bn |
| 90 | Tanzania | Africa | $2.8bn |
| 91 | Ethiopia | Africa | $2.7bn |
| 92 | Bahrain | Middle East | $2.6bn |
| 93 | Georgia | Asia | $2.5bn |
| 94 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Europe | $2.4bn |
| 95 | Albania | Europe | $2.3bn |
| 96 | Senegal | Africa | $2.2bn |
| 97 | Uganda | Africa | $2.1bn |
| 98 | Nepal | Asia | $2.0bn |
| 99 | Moldova | Europe | $1.9bn |
| 100 | Mauritius | Africa | $1.8bn |
Data note: rounded estimates from HS 87 merchandise import records in current US dollars, with 2024 used as the 2025 snapshot baseline. Country coverage, reporter updates and late revisions can change exact values and positions in source databases.
How concentrated automotive imports are at the top
The largest 20 importers show a sharp break after the United States. European countries then form a dense cluster, reflecting the combination of consumer demand, assembly networks and intra-European trade.
- United States — $383.5bn
- Germany — $95.4bn
- Canada — $92.8bn
- United Kingdom — $84.5bn
- France — $78.8bn
- China — $72.6bn
- Belgium — $69.2bn
- Mexico — $61.7bn
- Netherlands — $57.6bn
- Spain — $55.8bn
Methodology
The ranking is based on the value of imported goods classified under HS chapter 87: vehicles other than railway or tramway rolling stock, and parts and accessories thereof. This is a broad automotive-trade measure. It includes passenger cars, goods vehicles, buses, tractors, motorcycles, trailers, chassis, bodies and motor-vehicle parts. It is therefore wider than a passenger-car-only ranking based on HS 8703.
Countries are sorted by import value in current US dollars. The article uses 2024 merchandise trade data as the 2025 snapshot baseline because full-year 2025 data are not uniformly available for all reporting economies at the same time. This avoids mixing complete annual data for some countries with partial-year data for others. Values are rounded to one decimal place in billions of dollars to keep the table readable.
The main data basis is UN Comtrade-style HS merchandise trade reporting, cross-checked with ITC Trade Map, WTO and World Bank WITS where comparable country-product views are available. Figures should be read as rounded estimates, not as an official UN Comtrade league table. Late national revisions, differences in reporter coverage and treatment of re-exports can change exact values after publication.
The indicator has several limits. Import value is affected by vehicle prices, currency movements, freight and insurance valuation, product mix and the share of high-end vehicles or parts. A country with strong domestic production can still import a large amount of components. A logistics hub can appear larger than its final domestic market because goods pass through ports or bonded distribution systems. The ranking is not a measure of car ownership, domestic vehicle sales, road quality, household affordability or future demand.
Insights from the ranking
Upper tier
The top of the ranking is shaped by three forces: very large consumer markets, premium vehicle demand and dense supply chains. The United States is the clearest case of end-market scale. Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy and Spain show how advanced European markets combine consumer demand with component trade and intra-regional flows.
Middle tier
The middle of the table includes assembly economies and fast-growing consumer markets. Poland, Czechia, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, Thailand, India, Malaysia and Mexico show that automotive imports can be high even where domestic production is significant, because production systems rely on cross-border parts and platform sourcing.
Lower part of Top 100
Countries near the lower end of the Top 100 usually have smaller populations, lower purchasing power, stricter import controls, smaller vehicle fleets or more limited industrial supply-chain integration. Their import value can still be economically important if vehicles and parts represent a large share of total goods imports.
Regional pattern
Europe is heavily represented because of close cross-border production and distribution networks. The Americas are dominated by the United States, Canada, Mexico and Brazil. Asia combines mature markets such as Japan and South Korea with large emerging markets such as India, Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam.
What this means for readers
For readers, this ranking separates automotive trade exposure from simple car-market size. A high rank can signal strong consumer purchasing power, a need for imported vehicles, a role in international logistics or dependence on imported components. For companies, it highlights markets where vehicle distribution, spare parts, aftermarket services, customs rules and logistics capacity matter most. For policymakers, it shows where automotive supply chains are most exposed to tariffs, exchange-rate changes, port disruptions and electrification shifts.
The ranking should be interpreted alongside vehicle production, new vehicle registrations, population, income levels, tariffs, fuel policy and EV adoption. Import value alone can overstate domestic demand in re-export hubs and understate the automotive importance of countries with large domestic production.
FAQ
What does automotive imports value measure?
It measures the dollar value of imported automotive goods classified under HS 87. This includes finished vehicles and many related parts, so it is broader than a passenger-car-only measure.
Does a high automotive import value mean a country has no car industry?
No. Many countries with strong automotive industries import large volumes of components, platforms, specialist vehicles and premium models. Germany, Mexico, Poland and Czechia are examples of economies where imports and domestic production can both be large.
What is the difference between HS 87 and HS 8703?
HS 87 is the broad vehicle chapter. HS 8703 is narrower and focuses on passenger cars and vehicles principally designed for transporting fewer than 10 people. This page uses HS 87 because the topic is automotive imports as a sector.
Why can a logistics hub rank higher than its domestic car market suggests?
Ports and distribution hubs can record large import values when vehicles or parts enter the country before being re-exported or distributed across a wider region. Belgium and the Netherlands are common examples in European automotive trade.
Why use value instead of vehicle counts?
Value captures both finished vehicles and parts in a single comparable monetary measure. Counts are useful for car sales, but they are harder to compare across trucks, motorcycles, parts, chassis and premium vehicles.
What are the main limitations of comparing countries this way?
The ranking is sensitive to prices, exchange rates, reporting lags, re-exports, product mix and the distinction between components and finished vehicles. It should not be read as a direct measure of household car ownership or domestic vehicle demand.
Sources
The ranking relies on official and intergovernmental merchandise trade datasets. National figures can change after late submissions, corrections or revisions. For exact figures, check the latest country-reporter records in the original databases.
Primary source for international merchandise trade by reporter, partner, year and HS commodity code.
https://comtradeplus.un.org/Used for country-product rankings and cross-checking HS 87 import totals based on UN Comtrade and ITC calculations.
https://www.trademap.org/Provides trade views based on COMTRADE data and helps validate country-product import records.
https://wits.worldbank.org/Used as an additional reference point for merchandise trade context and international comparability.
https://data.wto.org/StatRanker (Website)
administrator