Top 100 Countries by Gasoline Price (USD/L), 2025
Gasoline prices are a policy signal as much as an energy-market signal
Retail gasoline prices look simple on the pump, but cross-country comparisons are rarely about crude oil alone. Taxes, subsidies, exchange rates, environmental levies, logistics, refinery access, price controls, and local retail margins all shape what drivers actually pay. That is why two economies facing the same global oil market can sit at opposite ends of the ranking.
For a reader, this metric matters because gasoline sits at the intersection of household budgets, inflation, commuting patterns, road freight, and transport policy. A high price per liter can reflect carbon-oriented taxation or structurally expensive distribution. A very low price can reflect large fuel subsidies, controlled pricing, or domestic resource rents. Neither extreme should be read mechanically as “good” or “bad” without context.
The table below is based on a public country comparison updated on 18 April 2026 and reflecting prices collected during the previous 12 months. It is best read as a late-2025 to early-2026 retail comparison, not as an official annual average.
What stands out at the top of the ranking
The upper end is not dominated by oil-poor countries alone. It is dominated by places where the final retail price is pushed up by taxation, dense urban policy, logistics, or broader cost-of-living structure. That is why Hong Kong, Israel, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Singapore, Denmark, and Greece sit near the top even though their energy situations differ markedly. The common denominator is that the consumer-facing price is shaped by policy and market structure, not just by upstream oil access.
One of the most revealing outliers is Albania, which appears among some of the world’s richest economies despite far lower average income levels. That is a reminder that expensive gasoline can coexist with weaker household purchasing power, making the affordability story harsher than the USD/L ranking alone suggests.
Dense urban logistics, land scarcity, and a structurally expensive consumer environment help keep pump prices at the very top of the table.
Retail gasoline prices are pushed up by tax policy and a high-cost market structure rather than by crude alone.
A wealthy oil producer can still have very expensive fuel at the pump when taxation and climate policy are layered on top.
The Dutch market is a classic example of how a rich, tax-heavy transport system can produce very high retail prices.
High incomes do not translate into cheap fuel; distribution costs, taxation, and strong-currency pricing matter.
Limited land, import dependence for refined fuels, and a premium urban transport environment keep prices elevated.
Like the Nordics more broadly, Denmark sits high because policy and tax design matter more than raw oil access.
Albania stands out because it appears among much richer economies despite lower income levels, showing how market structure and taxes can dominate affordability.
Island logistics, taxation, and structurally expensive retail distribution keep Greece in the top tier.
Very high posted prices should be read with caution because scarcity, exchange-rate distortion, and market fragmentation can overwhelm normal tax logic.
Top 20 highest gasoline prices in the table
The bars below show the relative distance between the highest-price markets in the table.
Table: 100 entries by gasoline price (USD/L)
The default view starts at Top 20. Use search, region, sort, and row-count controls to narrow the comparison. Hong Kong (China) and Puerto Rico are kept because they appear as distinct entries in the public source table used here.
| Position | Country | Region | Price (USD/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hong Kong (China) | Asia | 3.25 |
| 2 | Israel | MENA | 2.47 |
| 3 | Norway | Europe | 2.31 |
| 4 | Netherlands | Europe | 2.30 |
| 5 | Switzerland | Europe | 2.28 |
| 6 | Singapore | Asia | 2.28 |
| 7 | Denmark | Europe | 2.26 |
| 8 | Albania | Europe | 2.21 |
| 9 | Greece | Europe | 2.14 |
| 10 | Syria | MENA | 2.09 |
| 11 | Finland | Europe | 2.09 |
| 12 | Italy | Europe | 2.08 |
| 13 | Ireland | Europe | 2.07 |
| 14 | France | Europe | 2.06 |
| 15 | Portugal | Europe | 2.04 |
| 16 | Germany | Europe | 2.01 |
| 17 | Uruguay | Americas | 1.97 |
| 18 | Hungary | Europe | 1.95 |
| 19 | Sweden | Europe | 1.94 |
| 20 | Estonia | Europe | 1.94 |
| 21 | Belgium | Europe | 1.93 |
| 22 | United Kingdom | Europe | 1.89 |
| 23 | Latvia | Europe | 1.88 |
| 24 | Serbia | Europe | 1.86 |
| 25 | Luxembourg | Europe | 1.83 |
| 26 | Austria | Europe | 1.82 |
| 27 | Slovakia | Europe | 1.82 |
| 28 | Spain | Europe | 1.79 |
| 29 | Croatia | Europe | 1.76 |
| 30 | Czech Republic | Europe | 1.74 |
| 31 | Slovenia | Europe | 1.74 |
| 32 | Montenegro | Europe | 1.72 |
| 33 | Poland | Europe | 1.71 |
| 34 | Romania | Europe | 1.71 |
| 35 | Lithuania | Europe | 1.69 |
| 36 | Cyprus | Europe | 1.67 |
| 37 | New Zealand | Oceania | 1.64 |
| 38 | Costa Rica | Americas | 1.59 |
| 39 | Malta | Europe | 1.58 |
| 40 | Zimbabwe | Africa | 1.58 |
| 41 | Bosnia And Herzegovina | Europe | 1.52 |
| 42 | Bulgaria | Europe | 1.52 |
| 43 | Chile | Americas | 1.49 |
| 44 | North Macedonia | Europe | 1.48 |
| 45 | Mauritius | Africa | 1.48 |
| 46 | Morocco | MENA | 1.47 |
| 47 | Mexico | Americas | 1.44 |
| 48 | Kenya | Africa | 1.43 |
| 49 | Jordan | MENA | 1.39 |
| 50 | Armenia | Asia | 1.39 |
| 51 | South Africa | Africa | 1.38 |
| 52 | Moldova | Europe | 1.38 |
| 53 | Ukraine | Europe | 1.36 |
| 54 | Peru | Americas | 1.34 |
| 55 | Australia | Oceania | 1.31 |
| 56 | Thailand | Asia | 1.28 |
| 57 | Cuba | Americas | 1.27 |
| 58 | Dominican Republic | Americas | 1.27 |
| 59 | Brazil | Americas | 1.23 |
| 60 | Turkey | Europe | 1.22 |
| 61 | Nepal | Asia | 1.16 |
| 62 | Argentina | Americas | 1.15 |
| 63 | Colombia | Americas | 1.15 |
| 64 | South Korea | Asia | 1.14 |
| 65 | Georgia | Europe | 1.13 |
| 66 | Canada | Americas | 1.12 |
| 67 | India | Asia | 1.10 |
| 68 | Japan | Asia | 1.10 |
| 69 | Sri Lanka | Asia | 1.08 |
| 70 | Philippines | Asia | 1.07 |
| 71 | Uzbekistan | Asia | 1.03 |
| 72 | Bangladesh | Asia | 1.01 |
| 73 | Puerto Rico | Americas | 0.97 |
| 74 | Taiwan | Asia | 0.96 |
| 75 | Belarus | Europe | 0.95 |
| 76 | Pakistan | Asia | 0.95 |
| 77 | Panama | Americas | 0.93 |
| 78 | Lebanon | MENA | 0.92 |
| 79 | United States | Americas | 0.89 |
| 80 | Tunisia | MENA | 0.88 |
| 81 | Vietnam | Asia | 0.84 |
| 82 | Russia | Europe | 0.83 |
| 83 | United Arab Emirates | MENA | 0.75 |
| 84 | Indonesia | Asia | 0.74 |
| 85 | Ecuador | Americas | 0.72 |
| 86 | Nigeria | Africa | 0.68 |
| 87 | Azerbaijan | Asia | 0.65 |
| 88 | Bolivia | Americas | 0.65 |
| 89 | Iraq | MENA | 0.62 |
| 90 | Oman | MENA | 0.62 |
| 91 | Saudi Arabia | MENA | 0.61 |
| 92 | Qatar | MENA | 0.56 |
| 93 | Malaysia | Asia | 0.55 |
| 94 | Kazakhstan | Asia | 0.53 |
| 95 | Bahrain | MENA | 0.51 |
| 96 | Venezuela | Americas | 0.50 |
| 97 | Iran | MENA | 0.43 |
| 98 | Egypt | MENA | 0.36 |
| 99 | Kuwait | MENA | 0.35 |
| 100 | Algeria | MENA | 0.35 |
Country values are shown in U.S. dollars per liter. The table is presented directly in the page so readers can review the full ranked list in one place.
Methodology
Gasoline-price comparisons are structurally harder than many macroeconomic rankings because there is no single intergovernmental table that publishes a fully harmonized same-day retail gasoline price for every country in the world. Public comparisons usually come from specialized aggregators that gather local regulatory, company, and official price information and convert it into a common retail unit.
For a late-2025 to early-2026 comparison, a year-end retail reading is a useful way to capture the cross-country spread without confusing a published annual mean with what drivers actually saw at the pump. The country table used here was updated on 18 April 2026 and reflects prices collected during the previous 12 months, so it is best read as a rolling retail comparison rather than as a one-day global count.
Prices are shown in USD per liter because that is the most familiar international comparison unit for a general audience. This improves comparability, but it also means countries can move up or down the ranking because of exchange-rate shifts even when local-currency pump prices do not change much.
To keep the title honest, the ranking is limited to 100 entries drawn from the public comparison table used here. The row listed by the source page as a disputed territory is not carried into the final table. Values are rounded to two decimals, regions are grouped into broad analytical buckets, and the table is sorted from highest to lowest gasoline price. Because the source table includes entries such as Hong Kong (China) and Puerto Rico, this page should be read as a 100-entry public comparison rather than as a sovereign-country-only list.
Main limitations: gasoline grades differ across markets; some countries use price caps or subsidy smoothing; tax structures vary enormously; island and remote markets face higher distribution costs; and a posted retail price says nothing by itself about affordability relative to wages, commuting patterns, or household vehicle dependence.
Insights from the distribution
Upper tier: taxation and policy dominate
The most expensive gasoline markets are concentrated in Europe plus a few dense, high-cost, policy-heavy Asian economies. This is not random. Many of these markets deliberately allow higher retail prices through fuel taxation and broader transport policy. The ranking therefore captures a political-economy choice as much as an energy-market outcome.
Lower tier: cheap fuel often means subsidy exposure
The bottom of the ranking is dominated by hydrocarbon producers and markets where the state still absorbs part of the fuel bill. Cheap fuel can protect households in the short run, but it can also create fiscal pressure, weaken incentives for efficiency, and make price corrections politically difficult later.
Middle of the table: where most countries actually live
The median in this 100-country table is 1.38 USD/L, and the arithmetic average is roughly 1.40 USD/L. That matters because public debate often swings between extreme examples at either end, while most countries sit in a much narrower and more policy-sensitive middle band.
Affordability is a separate question
A country can have “moderate” gasoline prices and still impose a heavy burden on households if incomes are low and car dependence is high. Conversely, some very expensive gasoline markets are easier to absorb because incomes, transit alternatives, and vehicle efficiency are stronger. Price is not the same thing as pain.
Most useful reading rule: use this ranking to compare policy environments and retail price outcomes, not to infer which country has the “best” fuel situation. A cheap liter can signal subsidies. An expensive liter can signal taxation, urban transport policy, or structural retail costs. The ranking becomes truly meaningful only after you pair it with income, inflation, and mobility context.
What this means for the reader
For households, gasoline prices matter because they leak into far more than the cost of filling a tank. They affect commuting decisions, school runs, last-mile delivery costs, and the price pressure on goods that move by road. In countries where public transport is thin or travel distances are long, gasoline behaves like a quasi-essential expense rather than a discretionary one.
For migrants, expatriates, and internationally mobile workers, the ranking is a useful correction against simplistic cost-of-living comparisons. A country with lower rents or cheaper food can still feel transport-expensive if gasoline is high and car ownership is functionally necessary. That is especially relevant outside large city cores, where the practical cost of mobility becomes part of real disposable income.
For investors and analysts, the table is a quick proxy for policy stance and fuel-market design. Very high prices often point to tax-heavy or environmentally constrained transport systems. Very low prices can point to subsidy commitments, hydrocarbon rents, or price controls that may not be fiscally durable. In both cases, gasoline prices can reveal broader state priorities.
FAQ
Why is Hong Kong at the top?
Because pump prices in dense, import-dependent, high-cost markets can be lifted sharply by taxes, logistics, and broader retail cost structure. A top ranking here does not mean Hong Kong pays more for crude oil than everyone else. It means the final consumer price at the pump is among the highest.
Does a cheap liter of gasoline mean a country is doing better?
No. Cheap gasoline can come from state subsidies, price caps, or domestic resource rents. That may support households in the short run, but it can also create fiscal costs, distort consumption, and lead to abrupt corrections later.
Why use USD per liter instead of local currency?
USD/L is the easiest way to compare countries in one table. The trade-off is that exchange-rate movements can shift rankings even when domestic-currency pump prices stay fairly stable, so the table should not be read as a pure tax-or-oil ranking.
Why is Albania so high relative to much richer economies?
That is exactly why the ranking is analytically useful. Albania shows that a high gasoline price is not reserved for the richest countries. Taxes, import dependence, refining structure, and local retail conditions can push pump prices up even where household incomes are much lower.
Can I use this ranking to judge affordability?
Only partially. Price per liter is the starting point. True affordability depends on wages, commuting distance, public transport availability, vehicle efficiency, and how much of household life still depends on private cars.
Why is the page framed around 2025 if the public table was updated in April 2026?
Because openly accessible gasoline-price tables often work as rolling retail snapshots rather than neat annual statistical releases. The table used here was updated on 18 April 2026 but is explicitly based on prices collected within the prior 12 months, which is why it works better as a 2025–2026 public comparison layer than as a strict official year average.
Sources
Numbeo — country gasoline price table
Main public table used for the ranking. It shows country-level gasoline prices in USD, carries a visible update timestamp, and states that the data are based on entries collected within the last 12 months. In the current version referenced here, the visible update time is 18 April 2026.
https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/prices_by_country.jsp?itemId=24GlobalPetrolPrices — world gasoline prices
Used to cross-check interpretation. This source explains why cross-country gasoline prices diverge and notes that taxes and subsidies are central drivers of the gap. It also provides a broad international retail-energy comparison framework.
https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/gasoline_prices/GlobalPetrolPrices — site methodology and data coverage
Useful for source transparency because it explains that the platform tracks retail energy prices in more than 150 countries and cross-checks the data using multiple sources.
https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/European Commission — Weekly Oil Bulletin
Official weekly retail oil-product price reference for EU countries, useful for validating the logic behind high-price European markets and for checking price-with-tax series.
https://energy.ec.europa.eu/data-and-analysis/weekly-oil-bulletin_enU.S. Energy Information Administration — gasoline and diesel update
Official reference for retail fuel pricing, taxes, and price-composition context in the United States. Helpful when explaining why pump prices are not just a crude-oil story.
https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/StatRanker (Website)
administrator