Top 100 Countries by High-Skilled Jobs Share in Total Employment, 2025
Countries with the largest share of high-skilled jobs in employment
High-skilled jobs share measures the proportion of employed people working in management, professional, technical and associate-professional occupations. It helps show whether an economy creates many professional and technical roles, rather than relying mainly on routine, informal or low-productivity work.
The 2025 ranking uses the latest available comparable employment-by-occupation data. For many countries, the latest observation is 2023 or 2024 because labor-force surveys are released with a lag. Values are rounded estimates and should be read as occupational-structure indicators, not wage rankings or official national rankings.
Overview of the 2025 high-skilled employment snapshot
Its high ranking reflects a dense mix of professional services, advanced manufacturing, healthcare, finance, research and technical occupations.
The leaders sit close together, mostly between 53% and 60%, and are mainly advanced service economies with large professional and technical workforces.
The midpoint of the ranking sits close to one-third of total employment, showing how unevenly high-skill occupations are distributed.
The indicator classifies jobs by occupation. It does not directly measure pay, job quality, productivity, informality or the skill level of every individual worker.
The top of the ranking is dominated by Europe, North America and several advanced Asia-Pacific economies. That pattern reflects the weight of professional services, public-sector specialists, ICT, finance, healthcare, education and technical occupations in mature service economies.
Top 10 countries by high-skilled jobs share
Countries at the top usually have large professional, technical and managerial workforces rather than labor markets dominated by agriculture, elementary services or routine production roles. Small financial and administrative hubs can rank high because a large share of their workforce is employed in offices, hospitals, schools, technology, research, government and business services.
Switzerland
59.8%Finance, pharmaceuticals, engineering, healthcare and research create a very large professional and technical workforce.
Luxembourg
58.9%A small labor market with a strong financial, legal, administrative and EU-institution footprint.
Netherlands
57.1%High shares of business services, logistics management, public administration, engineering and digital work.
Sweden
56.4%Strong public services, ICT, engineering, life sciences and high tertiary-education attainment support the ranking.
Denmark
55.8%A knowledge-intensive economy with large healthcare, education, public administration and advanced services sectors.
Norway
55.2%Energy, public services, engineering and professional work lift the high-skilled occupational share.
Singapore
54.6%A compact hub for finance, logistics management, ICT, pharmaceuticals and regional headquarters functions.
United Kingdom
54.1%Large professional-services, finance, healthcare, education, creative and technology sectors drive the high share.
Finland
53.8%Education, public services, engineering and technology-intensive industries keep the occupational structure skill-heavy.
Iceland
53.2%A small, high-income labor market where public services, tourism management and professional work carry substantial weight.
Top 20 summary table
| Rank | Country | Share | Region |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Switzerland | 59.8% | Europe |
| 2 | Luxembourg | 58.9% | Europe |
| 3 | Netherlands | 57.1% | Europe |
| 4 | Sweden | 56.4% | Europe |
| 5 | Denmark | 55.8% | Europe |
| 6 | Norway | 55.2% | Europe |
| 7 | Singapore | 54.6% | Asia |
| 8 | United Kingdom | 54.1% | Europe |
| 9 | Finland | 53.8% | Europe |
| 10 | Iceland | 53.2% | Europe |
| 11 | Israel | 52.7% | Middle East |
| 12 | Ireland | 52.4% | Europe |
| 13 | Belgium | 51.9% | Europe |
| 14 | Germany | 50.8% | Europe |
| 15 | Canada | 50.4% | Americas |
| 16 | France | 49.8% | Europe |
| 17 | Australia | 49.2% | Oceania |
| 18 | Estonia | 48.6% | Europe |
| 19 | United States | 48.1% | Americas |
| 20 | Austria | 47.8% | Europe |
Values are rounded shares of total employment in high-skilled occupational groups. The full ranking below can be searched by country, filtered by region and sorted by share.
Chart: high-skilled jobs share among the Top 20
Among the Top 20, the first and twentieth countries are separated by about 12 percentage points. The distance between the upper and lower parts of the full Top 100 is much wider.
- Switzerland — 59.8%
- Luxembourg — 58.9%
- Netherlands — 57.1%
- Sweden — 56.4%
- Denmark — 55.8%
- Norway — 55.2%
- Singapore — 54.6%
- United Kingdom — 54.1%
- Finland — 53.8%
- Iceland — 53.2%
Methodology
The ranking is based on the occupational structure of employment. High-skilled jobs are defined as employment in occupational groups that broadly correspond to managers, professionals, technicians and associate professionals. In ISCO-08 terms, this is closest to major groups 1, 2 and 3. The share is calculated as high-skilled employment divided by total employment, multiplied by 100.
For the 2025 snapshot, the table uses the latest comparable labor-force data. The underlying observations are mostly labor-force survey releases for 2023 or 2024. Countries are included only when occupational categories are sufficiently comparable; values are rounded to one decimal point to avoid false precision.
This indicator is not a direct measure of income. A country can have a high share of professional and technical workers while still having wage dispersion, high housing costs or unequal access to opportunity. Likewise, a lower share does not mean that skilled people are absent; it often means that agriculture, elementary services, routine production, informality or low-productivity self-employment account for a larger part of total employment.
International comparability is affected by survey timing, national coding practice, informal work coverage and the treatment of armed forces, unpaid family workers and small self-employment. Because public occupational datasets differ in coverage and release timing, values should be treated as harmonized estimates rather than exact one-source observations.
Top 100 countries by high-skilled jobs share in total employment
The table is sorted from the highest high-skilled occupational share to the lowest within this Top 100 snapshot. Search by country, filter by region or compare Top 10, Top 20 and All 100.
| Rank | Country | High-skilled jobs share | Region |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Switzerland | 59.8% | Europe |
| 2 | Luxembourg | 58.9% | Europe |
| 3 | Netherlands | 57.1% | Europe |
| 4 | Sweden | 56.4% | Europe |
| 5 | Denmark | 55.8% | Europe |
| 6 | Norway | 55.2% | Europe |
| 7 | Singapore | 54.6% | Asia |
| 8 | United Kingdom | 54.1% | Europe |
| 9 | Finland | 53.8% | Europe |
| 10 | Iceland | 53.2% | Europe |
| 11 | Israel | 52.7% | Middle East |
| 12 | Ireland | 52.4% | Europe |
| 13 | Belgium | 51.9% | Europe |
| 14 | Germany | 50.8% | Europe |
| 15 | Canada | 50.4% | Americas |
| 16 | France | 49.8% | Europe |
| 17 | Australia | 49.2% | Oceania |
| 18 | Estonia | 48.6% | Europe |
| 19 | United States | 48.1% | Americas |
| 20 | Austria | 47.8% | Europe |
| 21 | Malta | 47.2% | Europe |
| 22 | Lithuania | 46.8% | Europe |
| 23 | Slovenia | 46.3% | Europe |
| 24 | Czechia | 45.7% | Europe |
| 25 | Latvia | 45.3% | Europe |
| 26 | New Zealand | 44.9% | Oceania |
| 27 | Spain | 44.4% | Europe |
| 28 | Cyprus | 44.0% | Europe |
| 29 | Japan | 43.5% | Asia |
| 30 | Korea, Rep. | 43.1% | Asia |
| 31 | Portugal | 42.6% | Europe |
| 32 | Italy | 42.2% | Europe |
| 33 | Poland | 41.8% | Europe |
| 34 | Croatia | 41.3% | Europe |
| 35 | Hungary | 40.9% | Europe |
| 36 | Slovakia | 40.3% | Europe |
| 37 | Greece | 39.8% | Europe |
| 38 | Romania | 39.1% | Europe |
| 39 | Bulgaria | 38.6% | Europe |
| 40 | Costa Rica | 38.0% | Americas |
| 41 | Chile | 37.4% | Americas |
| 42 | Uruguay | 36.9% | Americas |
| 43 | Argentina | 36.4% | Americas |
| 44 | United Arab Emirates | 36.0% | Middle East |
| 45 | Saudi Arabia | 35.5% | Middle East |
| 46 | Qatar | 35.0% | Middle East |
| 47 | Malaysia | 34.7% | Asia |
| 48 | Türkiye | 34.1% | Europe/Asia |
| 49 | Serbia | 33.7% | Europe |
| 50 | Montenegro | 33.2% | Europe |
| 51 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.8% | Europe |
| 52 | North Macedonia | 32.2% | Europe |
| 53 | Moldova | 31.7% | Europe |
| 54 | Ukraine | 31.1% | Europe |
| 55 | Armenia | 30.8% | Europe/Asia |
| 56 | Georgia | 30.2% | Europe/Asia |
| 57 | Kazakhstan | 29.8% | Europe/Asia |
| 58 | Azerbaijan | 29.1% | Europe/Asia |
| 59 | China | 28.7% | Asia |
| 60 | Brazil | 28.2% | Americas |
| 61 | Mexico | 27.8% | Americas |
| 62 | Panama | 27.3% | Americas |
| 63 | Colombia | 26.9% | Americas |
| 64 | Peru | 26.2% | Americas |
| 65 | Ecuador | 25.8% | Americas |
| 66 | Dominican Republic | 25.4% | Americas |
| 67 | Thailand | 25.0% | Asia |
| 68 | Philippines | 24.6% | Asia |
| 69 | South Africa | 24.2% | Africa |
| 70 | Mauritius | 23.8% | Africa |
| 71 | Tunisia | 23.3% | Africa |
| 72 | Morocco | 22.9% | Africa |
| 73 | Egypt | 22.4% | Africa |
| 74 | Jordan | 22.0% | Middle East |
| 75 | Lebanon | 21.5% | Middle East |
| 76 | Indonesia | 21.1% | Asia |
| 77 | Viet Nam | 20.6% | Asia |
| 78 | Mongolia | 20.2% | Asia |
| 79 | Paraguay | 19.8% | Americas |
| 80 | Albania | 19.4% | Europe |
| 81 | Sri Lanka | 18.9% | Asia |
| 82 | El Salvador | 18.5% | Americas |
| 83 | Guatemala | 18.1% | Americas |
| 84 | Honduras | 17.7% | Americas |
| 85 | India | 17.3% | Asia |
| 86 | Bangladesh | 16.8% | Asia |
| 87 | Pakistan | 16.2% | Asia |
| 88 | Nepal | 15.8% | Asia |
| 89 | Kenya | 15.3% | Africa |
| 90 | Ghana | 14.9% | Africa |
| 91 | Nigeria | 14.5% | Africa |
| 92 | Senegal | 14.0% | Africa |
| 93 | Côte d'Ivoire | 13.6% | Africa |
| 94 | Tanzania | 13.1% | Africa |
| 95 | Uganda | 12.7% | Africa |
| 96 | Rwanda | 12.3% | Africa |
| 97 | Ethiopia | 11.8% | Africa |
| 98 | Cambodia | 11.4% | Asia |
| 99 | Lao PDR | 10.9% | Asia |
| 100 | Mozambique | 10.5% | Africa |
Data note: rounded estimates based on ILOSTAT employment by sex and occupation, supplemented with OECD, Eurostat, World Bank and UNESCO/OECD education context. The 2025 view uses the latest comparable occupational-structure data; values are rounded to 0.1 percentage point.
Insights from the high-skilled jobs ranking
The upper part of the ranking is dominated by advanced service economies. These countries tend to have large concentrations of professionals in healthcare, education, finance, software, engineering, business services, public administration and research. The strongest performers also have deep tertiary-education systems and labor markets that absorb graduates into professional roles rather than leaving them in underemployment.
The middle of the table is more mixed. It includes Central and Eastern European economies with strong technical workforces, Gulf countries with sizable professional and administrative sectors, and upper-middle-income economies where services and skilled industrial roles are expanding. In this group, the high-skilled share often rises when manufacturing becomes more complex, public services professionalize, and digital business services expand.
The lower part of this Top 100 is shaped by structural employment realities. Countries with larger agricultural, informal, elementary-service or low-productivity self-employment sectors naturally show lower high-skilled shares even when they have fast-growing pools of engineers, doctors, teachers or software workers. A low national share can therefore coexist with highly skilled urban clusters.
The ranking measures the structure of employment, not the talent of a population. It shows whether an economy creates enough professional and technical jobs to absorb skilled workers at scale.
What this means for readers
For workers and students, the indicator helps frame where economies are more likely to offer professional, technical and managerial career paths. A higher share suggests a deeper market for specialized occupations, although it does not guarantee high pay in every profession or easy entry for foreign workers.
For companies and investors, the ranking gives a rough signal of talent-pool depth. A country with a higher high-skilled employment share may offer broader access to managers, analysts, engineers, healthcare professionals, researchers, software workers and technical specialists. The figure still needs to be checked against wages, language, regulation, migration rules and sector-specific demand.
For policymakers, the ranking connects education policy with labor-market absorption. Producing graduates is not enough if the economy does not generate jobs that use advanced skills. The most resilient countries combine education quality, productive firms, professional public services, digital infrastructure and pathways from training into skilled employment.
FAQ
What counts as a high-skilled job?
In this ranking, high-skilled jobs are occupational groups closest to managers, professionals, technicians and associate professionals. These include roles such as engineers, teachers, doctors, nurses, software workers, financial specialists, researchers, public administrators and technical supervisors.
Does a higher share mean higher wages?
Not automatically. A high share means more people work in occupations usually associated with advanced skills. It does not measure wage levels, cost of living, job security, tax burden or inequality inside the country.
Why do small advanced economies often rank high?
Small high-income economies can have compact labor markets dominated by finance, government, headquarters functions, education, healthcare, ICT and professional services. These sectors raise the occupational share of high-skilled employment.
Why can industrial countries rank below service economies?
Manufacturing includes many skilled roles, but it also includes production, assembly, transport and routine occupations. Service economies with larger professional, administrative, research and technical sectors may therefore show a higher high-skilled share.
Is this the same as education level?
No. Education level measures qualifications of people; this ranking measures the occupations people actually hold. A country can have many graduates but a lower high-skilled jobs share if the economy does not create enough professional and technical roles.
Why are some countries hard to compare?
Labor-force surveys differ by timing, occupational coding, informal-work coverage and sample design. Some countries also have older data or less detailed occupational classifications, which can affect international comparability.
How should this ranking be used?
Use it as a structural labor-market signal. It helps compare economies by the scale of professional and technical employment, but it should be combined with wage data, sector demand, education indicators, productivity and migration rules before making personal or business decisions.
Sources
Employment by occupational group and country coverage for the ranking.
https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/ILO labor-market datasets covering employment, occupation and related labor-force indicators.
https://data.ilo.org/Cross-check for occupational and labor-market context among OECD economies.
https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/oecd-employment-database.htmlEuropean labor-market context and occupational data for EU and EFTA economies.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostatLabor-force, education and development context for interpreting differences across economies.
https://data.worldbank.org/Background on tertiary education and human-capital patterns related to high-skilled employment.
https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/education.htmlStatRanker (Website)
administrator