Countries by Income Share of the Bottom 40 Percent: 2026 Latest-Observation Snapshot
Countries by Income Share of the Bottom 40 Percent
This is a 2026 latest-observation snapshot, not a same-year 2026 dataset. The ranking compares countries by the share of measured income or consumption received by the bottom 40 percent of the population. Higher values mean the lowest two quintiles receive a larger share of total measured household welfare.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!The table is a calculated World Bank bottom 40 share dataset built from two official WDI/PIP component series: income share held by the lowest 20 percent plus income share held by the second 20 percent. It is useful for searches such as bottom 40 income share by country, lowest 40 percent income share, World Bank bottom 40 share and shared prosperity context, but it should not be read as a current-year inequality estimate for every country.
Coverage is the Top 100 country entries after filtering out aggregates and keeping only rows where both component series are present for the same country observation. Every displayed value is an official component-derived value: the two component inputs are World Bank WDI/PIP observations, while the bottom-40 value is the sum of those two official components.
Continue exploring
More StatRanker rankings on wages, income, housing costs and affordability.
TOP 10 Countries by Share of Children in Single-Parent Households (2025)
Open rankingTOP 10 Countries with Highest Share of Single-Person Households (2025)
Open rankingBelarus ranks first in the table, based on 2020 component observations.
Rwanda is the 100th row in this Top 100, using a 2023 observation.
100 official component-derived rows; 0 forecast rows; 0 modeled projection rows.
Percent of income or consumption; higher values indicate a larger share for the bottom 40 percent.
Overview: how to read the bottom-40 income share by country
The bottom-40 share is a distribution indicator. It answers one narrow question: what share of measured income or consumption goes to the poorest 40 percent of people in a country’s household survey distribution? It is not a poverty headcount, not a median income measure and not a measure of absolute living standards.
In a perfectly equal distribution, the bottom 40 percent would receive 40 percent of total income or consumption. No country in this table comes close to that benchmark. The highest values are around 23–25 percent, which means the ranking identifies relatively more even distributions, not equal societies.
Top 10 countries by World Bank bottom 40 share
The Top 10 is led by Belarus, Azerbaijan, India and Slovenia. The upper group is strongly represented by Europe and Central Asia, but the interpretation is shaped by survey timing: Azerbaijan’s high value is from 2005, while several European entries use 2023 observations.
| Rank | Country | Value | Source / method note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belarus | 24.8% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2020; lowest 20% 10.3 + second 20% 14.5. |
| 2 | Azerbaijan | 24.7% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2005; lowest 20% 10.8 + second 20% 13.9. |
| 3 | India | 24.6% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2022; lowest 20% 10.4 + second 20% 14.2. |
| 4 | Slovenia | 24.6% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2023; lowest 20% 10.0 + second 20% 14.6. |
| 5 | Slovak Republic | 24.4% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2023; lowest 20% 9.1 + second 20% 15.3. |
| 6 | Ukraine | 24.3% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2020; lowest 20% 10.0 + second 20% 14.3. |
| 7 | Czechia | 24.2% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2023; lowest 20% 9.5 + second 20% 14.7. |
| 8 | Netherlands | 24.0% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2021; lowest 20% 9.4 + second 20% 14.6. |
| 9 | Moldova | 23.8% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2023; lowest 20% 9.9 + second 20% 13.9. |
| 10 | Iceland | 23.7% | official_value; component-derived from World Bank WDI/PIP; 2019; lowest 20% 9.4 + second 20% 14.3. |
Values are rounded to one decimal place after summing the two WDI/PIP component series. Equal rounded values are ordered alphabetically by country name.
Chart: Top 20 bottom-40 shares on a narrowed scale
The Top 20 ranges from 24.8 percent to 23.0 percent. The chart uses a narrowed baseline so small differences inside this tight range remain visible; it should not be read as a zero-based comparison of total welfare.
Chart values are written directly in HTML. The narrowed scale makes the small Top 20 spread legible while the labels preserve the actual percentages.
Methodology
The ranking uses a static distribution measure: the share of total income or consumption accruing to the bottom 40 percent of the population. WDI publishes the two relevant quintile shares separately, so the displayed bottom-40 value is calculated as a component sum.
- Formula: bottom-40 share = SI.DST.FRST.20 + SI.DST.02ND.20.
- Source hierarchy: official World Bank WDI/PIP component series first; PIP and World Bank shared prosperity documentation for methodology and comparability context.
- Unit: percent of income or consumption. Values are rounded to one decimal place after summing the two component series.
- Direction: higher values mean the lowest two quintiles receive a larger share of measured welfare.
- Target year: 2026 latest-observation snapshot. The row year is the latest available survey observation for that country, not a same-year 2026 measurement.
- Inclusion rule: countries only; aggregates, regions and income groups are excluded; both component series must be present for the same country observation.
- Ranking rule: rows are ranked by calculated value in descending order. If rounded values tie, countries are ordered alphabetically by country name.
- Status rule: each row is marked official_value because it is derived from official WDI/PIP component observations. The final bottom-40 value is a calculated sum, not a separate official forecast or modeled projection.
- Income vs consumption: countries may use income-based or consumption-based household welfare concepts depending on survey practice. Consumption distributions often look smoother than income distributions.
- Limit: old survey observations remain valid historical observations but are weaker evidence for current conditions than 2023 or 2024 rows.
The metric does not measure the absolute income of poor households, the poverty rate, the Gini index, public-service quality, purchasing power or the growth of the bottom 40 percent. It should be read with poverty, median income, Gini and survey-year information.
Data freshness: why survey year matters
Household surveys are not collected on the same schedule in every country. This table therefore combines the latest available country observations rather than forcing all countries into a single 2026 reporting year.
These rows are the strongest for current comparison inside this Top 100 snapshot.
These remain relatively recent, but should still be read as survey-year observations.
Older observations include Azerbaijan 2005, Jordan 2010, Algeria 2011, Nauru 2012, Solomon Islands 2012, Timor-Leste 2014, Sudan 2014 and Yemen 2014.
No 2025 or 2026 estimates are modeled. All values come from observed component series.
Main ranking table: Top 100 countries by lowest 40 percent income share
Use the controls to search by country, filter by region or value type, and sort by rank, value, year or country name. The original rank is based on value descending with alphabetical ordering for equal rounded values.
| Rank | Country | Value | Source / method note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belarus | 24.8% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2020; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 10.3 + second 20% 14.5. |
| 2 | Azerbaijan | 24.7% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2005; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 10.8 + second 20% 13.9. |
| 3 | India | 24.6% | official_value; component-derived; South Asia; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 10.4 + second 20% 14.2. |
| 4 | Slovenia | 24.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 10.0 + second 20% 14.6. |
| 5 | Slovak Republic | 24.4% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.1 + second 20% 15.3. |
| 6 | Ukraine | 24.3% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2020; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 10.0 + second 20% 14.3. |
| 7 | Czechia | 24.2% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.5 + second 20% 14.7. |
| 8 | Netherlands | 24.0% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.4 + second 20% 14.6. |
| 9 | Moldova | 23.8% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.9 + second 20% 13.9. |
| 10 | Iceland | 23.7% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2019; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.4 + second 20% 14.3. |
| 11 | Kyrgyz Republic | 23.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.9 + second 20% 13.7. |
| 12 | Armenia | 23.5% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.5 + second 20% 14.0. |
| 13 | Belgium | 23.5% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.1 + second 20% 14.4. |
| 14 | Norway | 23.5% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.1 + second 20% 14.4. |
| 15 | Egypt, Arab Rep. | 23.2% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.7 + second 20% 13.5. |
| 16 | Finland | 23.2% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.2 + second 20% 14.0. |
| 17 | Syrian Arab Republic | 23.2% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.2 + second 20% 14.0. |
| 18 | Algeria | 23.1% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2011; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.4 + second 20% 13.7. |
| 19 | Tonga | 23.1% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.3 + second 20% 13.8. |
| 20 | Kiribati | 23.0% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2019; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.5 + second 20% 13.5. |
| 21 | United Arab Emirates | 23.0% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2018; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.2 + second 20% 14.8. |
| 22 | Kazakhstan | 22.9% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.8 + second 20% 13.1. |
| 23 | Timor-Leste | 22.8% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2014; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.4 + second 20% 13.4. |
| 24 | Pakistan | 22.7% | official_value; component-derived; South Asia; 2018; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.6 + second 20% 13.1. |
| 25 | Denmark | 22.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.1 + second 20% 13.5. |
| 26 | Ireland | 22.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 9.2 + second 20% 13.4. |
| 27 | Poland | 22.5% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.6 + second 20% 13.9. |
| 28 | Bhutan | 22.3% | official_value; component-derived; South Asia; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.8 + second 20% 13.5. |
| 29 | Maldives | 22.1% | official_value; component-derived; South Asia; 2019; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.9 + second 20% 13.2. |
| 30 | Iraq | 22.0% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.9 + second 20% 13.1. |
| 31 | Myanmar | 21.9% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2017; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.9 + second 20% 13.0. |
| 32 | Nepal | 21.8% | official_value; component-derived; South Asia; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.7 + second 20% 13.1. |
| 33 | Sweden | 21.7% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.9 + second 20% 13.8. |
| 34 | Albania | 21.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2020; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.4 + second 20% 13.2. |
| 35 | Bangladesh | 21.6% | official_value; component-derived; South Asia; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.8 + second 20% 12.8. |
| 36 | Guinea | 21.6% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2018; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.5 + second 20% 13.1. |
| 37 | Cyprus | 21.3% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.6 + second 20% 12.7. |
| 38 | Estonia | 21.3% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.3 + second 20% 13.0. |
| 39 | Fiji | 21.3% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2019; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.4 + second 20% 12.9. |
| 40 | Croatia | 21.2% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.8 + second 20% 13.4. |
| 41 | Canada | 21.1% | official_value; component-derived; North America; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.2 + second 20% 12.9. |
| 42 | Ethiopia | 21.1% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.3 + second 20% 12.8. |
| 43 | Hungary | 21.1% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2017; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.9 + second 20% 13.2. |
| 44 | Niger | 21.1% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.7 + second 20% 12.4. |
| 45 | Austria | 20.9% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.7 + second 20% 13.2. |
| 46 | Mongolia | 20.8% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.2 + second 20% 12.6. |
| 47 | Romania | 20.8% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.0 + second 20% 13.8. |
| 48 | France | 20.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.7 + second 20% 12.9. |
| 49 | Germany | 20.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2020; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.8 + second 20% 12.8. |
| 50 | Nauru | 20.5% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2012; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.0 + second 20% 12.5. |
| 51 | Jordan | 20.3% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2010; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.2 + second 20% 12.1. |
| 52 | Mauritania | 20.3% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2019; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.8 + second 20% 12.5. |
| 53 | United Kingdom | 20.2% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.7 + second 20% 12.5. |
| 54 | Japan | 20.0% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2020; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.9 + second 20% 13.1. |
| 55 | Tunisia | 20.0% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.7 + second 20% 12.3. |
| 56 | Vanuatu | 20.0% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2019; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.6 + second 20% 12.4. |
| 57 | Indonesia | 19.9% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2024; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 8.1 + second 20% 11.8. |
| 58 | Korea, Rep. | 19.9% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.5 + second 20% 12.4. |
| 59 | Portugal | 19.9% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.4 + second 20% 12.5. |
| 60 | Sudan | 19.9% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2014; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.8 + second 20% 12.1. |
| 61 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 19.8% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2011; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.5 + second 20% 12.3. |
| 62 | Greece | 19.8% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.2 + second 20% 12.6. |
| 63 | Guinea-Bissau | 19.8% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.9 + second 20% 11.9. |
| 64 | Russian Federation | 19.8% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.7 + second 20% 12.1. |
| 65 | Thailand | 19.8% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.9 + second 20% 11.9. |
| 66 | Australia | 19.7% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2020; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.3 + second 20% 12.4. |
| 67 | Serbia | 19.7% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.9 + second 20% 12.8. |
| 68 | Seychelles | 19.7% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2018; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.1 + second 20% 12.6. |
| 69 | Switzerland | 19.7% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.4 + second 20% 12.3. |
| 70 | Latvia | 19.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.2 + second 20% 12.4. |
| 71 | Malta | 19.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.3 + second 20% 12.3. |
| 72 | Sierra Leone | 19.6% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2018; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.9 + second 20% 11.7. |
| 73 | Benin | 19.5% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.6 + second 20% 11.9. |
| 74 | Georgia | 19.5% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2024; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.3 + second 20% 12.2. |
| 75 | Nigeria | 19.5% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.5 + second 20% 12.0. |
| 76 | Cote d'Ivoire | 19.2% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.6 + second 20% 11.6. |
| 77 | Barbados | 19.1% | official_value; component-derived; Latin America & Caribbean; 2016; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.9 + second 20% 12.2. |
| 78 | Luxembourg | 19.1% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.1 + second 20% 12.0. |
| 79 | Mali | 19.1% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.6 + second 20% 11.5. |
| 80 | Spain | 19.1% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.5 + second 20% 12.6. |
| 81 | Italy | 18.9% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.6 + second 20% 12.3. |
| 82 | Marshall Islands | 18.9% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2019; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.2 + second 20% 11.7. |
| 83 | Liberia | 18.8% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2016; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.2 + second 20% 11.6. |
| 84 | Mauritius | 18.8% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2017; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.2 + second 20% 11.6. |
| 85 | Senegal | 18.8% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.3 + second 20% 11.5. |
| 86 | Yemen, Rep. | 18.8% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2014; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.3 + second 20% 11.5. |
| 87 | China | 18.7% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.3 + second 20% 11.4. |
| 88 | Iran, Islamic Rep. | 18.7% | official_value; component-derived; Middle East & North Africa; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.0 + second 20% 11.7. |
| 89 | Madagascar | 18.7% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.2 + second 20% 11.5. |
| 90 | Uzbekistan | 18.7% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2024; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.6 + second 20% 12.1. |
| 91 | Tajikistan | 18.6% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2024; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.1 + second 20% 11.5. |
| 92 | Viet Nam | 18.6% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.8 + second 20% 11.8. |
| 93 | Burkina Faso | 18.5% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.3 + second 20% 11.2. |
| 94 | Sri Lanka | 18.5% | official_value; component-derived; South Asia; 2019; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.4 + second 20% 11.1. |
| 95 | Lithuania | 18.4% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.5 + second 20% 11.9. |
| 96 | Solomon Islands | 18.4% | official_value; component-derived; East Asia & Pacific; 2012; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.0 + second 20% 11.4. |
| 97 | Burundi | 18.3% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2020; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.1 + second 20% 11.2. |
| 98 | Kenya | 18.3% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2022; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.2 + second 20% 11.1. |
| 99 | Montenegro | 18.3% | official_value; component-derived; Europe & Central Asia; 2021; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 6.2 + second 20% 12.1. |
| 100 | Rwanda | 18.3% | official_value; component-derived; Sub-Saharan Africa; 2023; WDI/PIP; lowest 20% 7.4 + second 20% 10.9. |
Showing 100 rows.
Source note: values are calculated from World Bank WDI/PIP component series SI.DST.FRST.20 and SI.DST.02ND.20. Data checked: June 17, 2026. Countries only; aggregates and regions excluded; both component values must be available for the same country observation.
Insights from the ranking
Key insight
The highest bottom-40 share is still far below the 40 percent equality benchmark. Belarus leads at 24.8 percent, which means the bottom 40 percent receives less than one quarter of measured income or consumption.
Notable pattern
The upper tier is tightly clustered. The difference between rank 1 and rank 20 is only 1.8 percentage points, so survey timing and rounding matter when interpreting small rank gaps.
Regional concentration
Europe and Central Asia appears heavily in the upper ranks and throughout the table, while Sub-Saharan Africa is more visible in the lower half of this Top 100.
Outlier
Azerbaijan ranks second, but the observation is from 2005. It is a value outlier and a timeliness outlier, so it should not be treated as evidence of current 2026 distribution conditions.
What this ranking means
For readers comparing living standards, the bottom-40 share should be read as a distribution signal, not as a welfare level. A country can have a relatively high bottom-40 share and still have widespread poverty if average income is low.
For policy analysis, the ranking helps identify where lower-income households receive a larger or smaller share of measured welfare. The next step is to compare these countries with poverty rates, median household income, public transfers, labor-market participation and the Gini index.
For researchers, journalists and investors, the survey-year column is essential. Recent observations from 2023 or 2024 are more useful for current interpretation than old observations, even when old observations rank highly.
FAQ
Which country has the highest bottom 40 income share in this table?
Belarus ranks first with a calculated bottom-40 share of 24.8 percent, based on the 2020 WDI/PIP component observations shown in the table.
Is this a real 2026 ranking?
It is a 2026 latest-observation snapshot, not a same-year 2026 survey dataset. Each row uses the latest available WDI/PIP observation listed for that country.
Why are two World Bank indicators added together?
The bottom 40 percent consists of two quintiles: the lowest 20 percent and the second 20 percent. WDI publishes those as separate component series, so this table adds them to calculate the lowest 40 percent income or consumption share.
Is the displayed bottom-40 value an official World Bank series?
No. The two inputs are official WDI/PIP component observations, while the displayed bottom-40 value is a calculated sum of those components. That is why row notes describe it as an official component-derived value.
Does a higher value mean poor households are richer?
No. A higher value means the bottom 40 percent receives a larger share of total measured income or consumption. Absolute income levels, price levels and public services must be checked separately.
Can income-based and consumption-based surveys be compared directly?
They can be compared only with caution. Consumption is often more stable and can appear less unequal than income, while income surveys may capture volatility and high-income measurement differently.
Why do some high-ranking rows use old survey years?
Household surveys are not conducted annually in every country. Old rows are included only because they are the latest available matched component observations for that country, but they are weaker for current interpretation.
Is this the same as the shared prosperity premium?
No. The shared prosperity premium is a growth measure over survey spells. This page ranks a static distribution share, using the two WDI quintile-share component series.
Sources
Primary numeric source for component series SI.DST.FRST.20, used as the first part of the bottom-40 calculation.
View sourcePrimary numeric source for component series SI.DST.02ND.20, used as the second part of the bottom-40 calculation.
View sourceMethodological context for poverty, inequality and household-survey-based welfare measurement.
View sourceContext source for bottom-40 measurement, shared prosperity concepts and survey comparability limits.
View sourceRelated rankings
More StatRanker rankings on wages, income, housing costs and affordability.
TOP 10 Countries by Share of Children in Single-Parent Households (2025)
Open rankingTOP 10 Countries with Highest Share of Single-Person Households (2025)
Open rankingStatRanker (Website)
administrator