StatRanker.org is a data-driven publication that organizes official economic and social statistics into clear country rankings and concise analytical notes. Our work is based on open data from institutions such as the World Bank, IMF, UN agencies and national statistical offices.
For each topic we select comparable indicators, document the latest available figures and highlight key trends across countries and regions. Special attention is given to the United States, including its role in the global economy and comparisons with other major economies.
Charts and tables on StatRanker.org are static visualizations created from these official sources. They are designed to help researchers, journalists, students and decision-makers quickly understand how countries differ in terms of growth, inflation, public debt, health expenditure, trade and other key metrics.
You may reference StatRanker.org as a source in your own articles, reports or presentations, and you may reproduce our charts or tables for editorial and educational purposes, provided that the content is not misleadingly altered and a clear attribution such as “Source: StatRanker.org (based on official data)” is included.
info@statranker.org
Updated: January 18, 2026
Median household income benchmarks the “middle” household in each state: half of households earn more and half earn less. Because it is less influenced by extreme high incomes than an average, it works well for cross-state comparisons and baseline economic context.
This ranking reflects income levels, not purchasing power. For affordability decisions, compare income alongside major recurring costs (housing, insurance, healthcare, childcare).
Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland, Hawaii, and California exceed $100,000 in median household income in this dataset.
The difference between #1 and #50 is large enough to dominate household budgeting outcomes even before considering taxes and local prices.
The median across state medians is around $77.8k, which is a useful reference point for “typical” conditions when comparing states.
Median household income (USD).
Median household income: ${fmtUSD(d.income)}.
Use the search box to quickly locate a state. Values are expressed in USD as provided by the source dataset used for the 2025 edition.
| Rank | State | Median household income |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massachusetts | $104,828 |
| 2 | New Jersey | $104,294 |
| 3 | Maryland | $102,905 |
| 4 | Hawaii | $100,745 |
| 5 | California | $100,149 |
| 6 | New Hampshire | $99,782 |
| 7 | Washington | $99,389 |
| 8 | Colorado | $97,113 |
| 9 | Utah | $96,658 |
| 10 | Connecticut | $96,049 |
| 11 | Alaska | $95,665 |
| 12 | Virginia | $92,090 |
| 13 | Delaware | $87,534 |
| 14 | Minnesota | $87,117 |
| 15 | New York | $85,820 |
| 16 | Oregon | $85,220 |
| 17 | Rhode Island | $83,504 |
| 18 | Illinois | $83,211 |
| 19 | Vermont | $82,730 |
| 20 | Arizona | $81,486 |
| 21 | Idaho | $81,166 |
| 22 | Nevada | $81,134 |
| 23 | Georgia | $79,991 |
| 24 | Texas | $79,721 |
| 25 | Florida | $77,735 |
| 26 | North Dakota | $77,871 |
| 27 | Pennsylvania | $77,545 |
| 28 | Wisconsin | $77,488 |
| 29 | South Dakota | $76,881 |
| 30 | Maine | $76,442 |
| 31 | Nebraska | $76,376 |
| 32 | Wyoming | $75,532 |
| 33 | Kansas | $75,514 |
| 34 | Iowa | $75,501 |
| 35 | Montana | $75,340 |
| 36 | North Carolina | $73,958 |
| 37 | Michigan | $72,389 |
| 38 | South Carolina | $72,350 |
| 39 | Ohio | $72,212 |
| 40 | Tennessee | $71,997 |
| 41 | Indiana | $71,959 |
| 42 | Missouri | $71,589 |
| 43 | New Mexico | $67,816 |
| 44 | Alabama | $66,659 |
| 45 | Oklahoma | $66,148 |
| 46 | Kentucky | $64,526 |
| 47 | Arkansas | $62,106 |
| 48 | Louisiana | $60,986 |
| 49 | West Virginia | $60,798 |
| 50 | Mississippi | $59,127 |
The top of the table is narrow and expensive. Only five states exceed $100,000 in median household income (Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland, Hawaii, California). That concentration matters because it implies the U.S. income landscape is not a smooth gradient—there are distinct tiers. Moving from a mid-pack state into the top tier often comes with a different labor market mix (more high-paying professional and technical work), but also higher recurring costs.
The gap between #1 and #50 is roughly $45,701, which is large enough to reshape household choices even before you factor in tax structures and local price levels. At the same time, “higher income” does not automatically mean “better affordability,” because many high-income states also have higher housing costs, higher insurance premiums, or more expensive childcare markets.
Concrete distribution signals from the table
If you’re comparing where the “typical” household is financially strongest, this metric is a clean starting point. If you’re comparing where a household can build the most breathing room, combine income with living-cost anchors (housing, insurance, healthcare).
Use the ranking to set expectations for the earning environment—but don’t stop there. A high-income state can still be financially stressful if housing absorbs a larger share of household budgets. A practical way to use this page is to shortlist states by income tier, then validate affordability using cost indicators relevant to your household (rent or mortgage, car insurance, health spending exposure, childcare).
Median household income is not a wage rate, but it’s a strong contextual benchmark. If an offer in a state with a much higher median is only slightly above your current income, you may be underestimating the cost pressure and the competitive landscape for housing and services.
Higher median household income can correlate with a broader tax base, more resilient local demand, and a deeper service economy. Lower medians can reflect structural factors such as industry mix, educational attainment patterns, rurality, and slower wage growth. The ranking is best interpreted as a symptom of deeper economic structure—then explored with sector and productivity context.
Median household income is the income level where 50% of households are above and 50% are below. This page uses the ACS subject table estimate for median household income (variable S1901_C01_012E).
This is the 2025 edition of the ranking, using the most recent state-level ACS 1-year values available for that release cycle. Scope is 50 U.S. states. The dataset also provides values for the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, which are excluded here to keep the ranking strictly “states only.”
The median is much less sensitive to extreme high incomes. A small number of very high earners can pull the average upward without changing what a “typical” household experiences. The median is the more stable benchmark for cross-state comparisons.
Not by itself. Higher income improves capacity, but living standards depend on what that income buys. Housing, taxes, insurance, and healthcare costs can materially change how far the median goes in day-to-day life.
The goal of this page is a strict “50 states” ranking. D.C. is not a state, and Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory. They appear in the underlying dataset, but are removed here for consistent state-only comparisons.
Yes. When medians are close, the practical difference can be small—and survey-based uncertainty can overlap. Treat close ranks as a band rather than a sharp hierarchy.
If you care about “how comfortable the median feels,” pair income with large recurring expenses: housing costs, insurance (auto and health exposure), and household essentials. Income is the numerator; costs determine the denominator.
Official references used for this ranking and for replicating the dataset pull.
administrator
Urbanization is one of the fastest ways to understand how a country is physically organized. A high urban share usually
Population · Demographics · Median age Median age by country in 2025: the full ranking behind the world’s oldest and
Top 100 Countries by Population Growth Rate, 2025 Demographics · Population · Annual change Top 100 Countries by Population Growth
Site managed by Oleksandr Isaienko (team lead; private entrepreneur) since
28 August 2025, registration code 133276738020, Ukraine.
Contact:
info@statranker.org.
Technical infrastructure (hosting/server resources) is located in the United States; a CDN may be used to improve performance with edge locations in multiple countries.