TOP 100 Largest Economies by Nominal GDP (2025)
Macroeconomics • 2025 snapshot
What this ranking measures (and why it matters)
Nominal GDP is the market value of all final goods and services produced within an economy over a year, expressed at current prices and converted into U.S. dollars using market/official exchange rates. It is the standard “headline” measure for comparing economic size because international trade, corporate revenues, and many financial contracts are priced in market currencies.
This ranking lists the top 100 economies by their 2025 nominal GDP (current US$). Nominal rankings are informative, but they are also sensitive to inflation and exchange-rate moves. That’s why economies can shift in USD size even when real (inflation-adjusted) growth looks steady.
Key takeaways
- Global output is concentrated: the top 10 economies account for roughly two thirds of world nominal GDP, and the top 20 for about four fifths.
- The “$1T club” is limited: only a few dozen economies reach trillion-dollar scale; after that, values quickly fall into hundreds of billions.
- The bottom of the top 100 is still meaningful: the #100 economy is around $47B — large enough for substantial domestic markets, but more sensitive to currency and commodity cycles.
- Nominal GDP is a currency lens: great for “global weight” questions (trade/finance), less direct for living standards (use PPP/per-capita for that).
World nominal GDP (2025, current US$)
$117.165T
US–China gap (2025, current US$)
$11.217T
Share of world GDP: Top 50 economies
93.7%
How to interpret nominal GDP correctly
A practical rule is to match the metric to the question. If you want to understand a country’s role in dollar-based trade, corporate scale, and external finance, nominal GDP is the right baseline. If you want to understand household purchasing power, compare GDP per capita (PPP) or income measures, because they adjust for population and local price levels.
For year-to-year changes, remember there are three drivers behind a move in USD GDP: (1) real output, (2) domestic inflation, and (3) exchange rates. In FX-volatile periods, the third factor can dominate the ranking.
Top 100 table
Values are formatted as trillions (T) or billions (B) for readability. The underlying dataset reports GDP in million US$. This table uses three columns to stay inside the container and converts to stacked “row cards” on mobile (no horizontal scroll).
| Rank | Economy | Nominal GDP (2025, current US$) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | $30.616T |
| 2 | China | $19.399T |
| 3 | Germany | $5.014T |
| 4 | Japan | $4.280T |
| 5 | India | $4.125T |
| 6 | United Kingdom | $3.959T |
| 7 | France | $3.362T |
| 8 | Italy | $2.544T |
| 9 | Russia | $2.541T |
| 10 | Canada | $2.284T |
| 11 | Brazil | $2.257T |
| 12 | Spain | $1.891T |
| 13 | Mexico | $1.863T |
| 14 | South Korea | $1.859T |
| 15 | Australia | $1.830T |
| 16 | Turkey | $1.565T |
| 17 | Indonesia | $1.443T |
| 18 | Netherlands | $1.321T |
| 19 | Saudi Arabia | $1.269T |
| 20 | Poland | $1.040T |
| 21 | Switzerland | $1.003T |
| 22 | Taiwan | $884.387B |
| 23 | Belgium | $716.980B |
| 24 | Ireland | $708.771B |
| 25 | Argentina | $683.371B |
| 26 | Sweden | $662.318B |
| 27 | Israel | $610.752B |
| 28 | Singapore | $574.185B |
| 29 | United Arab Emirates | $569.097B |
| 30 | Austria | $566.456B |
| 31 | Thailand | $558.573B |
| 32 | Norway | $517.102B |
| 33 | Philippines | $494.158B |
| 34 | Vietnam | $484.726B |
| 35 | Bangladesh | $475.011B |
| 36 | Malaysia | $470.572B |
| 37 | Denmark | $459.612B |
| 38 | Colombia | $438.121B |
| 39 | Hong Kong | $428.233B |
| 40 | South Africa | $426.383B |
| 41 | Romania | $422.508B |
| 42 | Pakistan | $410.495B |
| 43 | Czech Republic | $383.384B |
| 44 | Iran | $356.513B |
| 45 | Egypt | $349.264B |
| 46 | Chile | $347.174B |
| 47 | Portugal | $337.936B |
| 48 | Peru | $318.480B |
| 49 | Finland | $314.724B |
| 50 | Kazakhstan | $300.052B |
| 51 | Algeria | $288.013B |
| 52 | Nigeria | $285.003B |
| 53 | Greece | $282.019B |
| 54 | Iraq | $265.455B |
| 55 | New Zealand | $262.909B |
| 56 | Hungary | $247.759B |
| 57 | Qatar | $222.119B |
| 58 | Ukraine | $209.713B |
| 59 | Morocco | $179.612B |
| 60 | Kuwait | $157.469B |
| 61 | Slovakia | $154.587B |
| 62 | Uzbekistan | $137.480B |
| 63 | Kenya | $136.014B |
| 64 | Ecuador | $130.529B |
| 65 | Dominican Republic | $129.748B |
| 66 | Bulgaria | $127.924B |
| 67 | Puerto Rico | $126.546B |
| 68 | Guatemala | $120.850B |
| 69 | Angola | $115.167B |
| 70 | Ghana | $111.963B |
| 71 | Ethiopia | $109.492B |
| 72 | Oman | $105.190B |
| 73 | Croatia | $103.901B |
| 74 | Costa Rica | $102.637B |
| 75 | Luxembourg | $100.642B |
| 76 | Serbia | $100.048B |
| 77 | Ivory Coast | $99.207B |
| 78 | Sri Lanka | $98.964B |
| 79 | Lithuania | $95.274B |
| 80 | Panama | $90.408B |
| 81 | Tanzania | $87.444B |
| 82 | Belarus | $85.739B |
| 83 | Uruguay | $84.986B |
| 84 | Venezuela | $82.767B |
| 85 | DR Congo | $82.262B |
| 86 | Slovenia | $79.221B |
| 87 | Azerbaijan | $76.390B |
| 88 | Turkmenistan | $72.119B |
| 89 | Uganda | $64.993B |
| 90 | Cameroon | $60.577B |
| 91 | Myanmar | $60.561B |
| 92 | Tunisia | $59.069B |
| 93 | Bolivia | $57.086B |
| 94 | Jordan | $56.157B |
| 95 | Zimbabwe | $53.310B |
| 96 | Macau | $52.379B |
| 97 | Cambodia | $48.802B |
| 98 | Libya | $47.941B |
| 99 | Latvia | $47.880B |
| 100 | Paraguay | $47.398B |
Notes: Nominal GDP is shown at current prices and converted to USD using market/official exchange rates. Figures follow the IMF WEO 2025 estimates/projections and may be revised in later releases.
Visual: the scale of the top 15
This chart shows how fast GDP size drops after the first two economies. It’s a useful “scale check”: once you move beyond #2, the ranking quickly falls from ~20T into the ~5T range and then to ~4–2T.
Chart not loaded. Same information as a readable list (top 15):
- United States — $30.616T
- China — $19.399T
- Germany — $5.014T
- Japan — $4.280T
- India — $4.125T
- United Kingdom — $3.959T
- France — $3.362T
- Italy — $2.544T
- Russia — $2.541T
- Canada — $2.284T
- Brazil — $2.257T
- Spain — $1.891T
- Mexico — $1.863T
- South Korea — $1.859T
- Australia — $1.830T
Chart note: values are in trillions of current US$ and match the 2025 numbers used in the table.
Insights: what stands out in 2025
1) The world economy is “top-heavy”
The world total looks enormous in dollar terms, but the distribution is even more striking. A relatively small group of economies drives most of the world’s nominal output. That concentration matters because global aggregates (trade volumes, capital flows, risk sentiment) are disproportionately shaped by what happens in the top tier.
For readers, this is a reminder that “global growth” is not evenly distributed. Even when dozens of economies are expanding, the final picture in current US$ can still be dominated by a few major currency blocs, inflation paths, and exchange-rate cycles.
2) Nominal GDP is a currency lens (and that’s the point)
Nominal GDP in USD combines real output, domestic prices, and exchange rates. This makes it especially useful for dollar-based comparisons: the ability to import and finance external liabilities, the scale of markets for global firms, and headline economic weight in international negotiations.
But it also explains why nominal rankings can move in ways that surprise casual readers. A currency depreciation can reduce USD GDP even if domestic production is stable. Conversely, a currency appreciation can boost USD GDP even if real growth is modest.
3) The US–China gap remains enormous in nominal terms
In 2025, the gap between #1 and #2 is still measured in double-digit trillions of dollars. That distance influences everything from the depth of capital markets to the scale of research spending and the ability to absorb global shocks. At the same time, after the top two, the ranking drops steeply into the $5T range and then into a broad $4–2T band.
4) Europe is “many large economies”, not one mega-economy
Europe appears as a dense cluster of large economies rather than a single outlier. The opportunity is a deep, diversified market; the operational reality is fragmentation across multiple tax, regulatory, and labor frameworks. For businesses, Europe’s scale is undeniable, but execution requires localization and compliance discipline.
5) The upper-middle tier matters for supply chains
Once you move below the trillion-dollar club, you enter a broad tier of $250B–$1T economies. Many of them are critical in specific global value chains: advanced manufacturing nodes, logistics hubs, commodity exporters, and fast-growing consumer markets. Their impact can be larger than their rank suggests because they sit at chokepoints of trade and production.
6) Near the bottom of the top 100, rankings are more volatile
Around ranks 70–100, a few billion dollars can move a country several positions. This “high sensitivity zone” is where FX swings, commodity cycles, and one-off revisions can visibly reshape the table from one release to the next.
What this means for readers
Treat nominal GDP as a market-size baseline — not as a direct measure of household prosperity. If your goal is business sizing (dollar revenue potential, international purchasing capacity, global corporate scale), nominal GDP is the right first step. If your goal is living standards, pair this with GDP per capita (PPP) and income distribution measures.
For trend interpretation, separate the three engines behind USD GDP: real growth, inflation, and exchange rates. A country can look “bigger” or “smaller” in dollars without a proportional change in real domestic activity — and that nuance is exactly why reading the methodology matters.
Methodology
- Indicator: nominal GDP (GDP at current prices) converted to current US$.
- Year: 2025 estimate/projection as reported in the source dataset.
- Units: underlying values are commonly reported in million US$; this page formats display values as T (trillions) or B (billions).
- Ranking: sorted in descending order by 2025 nominal GDP; only economies with a reported 2025 value are included in the top 100.
- Limitations: currency sensitivity, possible revisions across releases, and the fact that GDP is not a welfare measure.
FAQ (Nominal GDP)
Why use nominal GDP instead of PPP GDP?+
Does a higher nominal GDP mean people are richer?+
Why can rankings change quickly from one year to the next?+
What does “current prices” mean?+
Are these numbers final?+
Sources (official) — with short descriptions
Narrative context for the WEO release: assumptions, global outlook, and the framework behind the projections.
Downloadable tables and country series used to build rankings; best source for exact units, revisions, and coverage.
Interactive viewer for quick country checks and comparisons across the WEO indicator set.
Alternative official GDP (current US$) series for cross-checking levels and definitions; includes methodology notes.
Reference compilation of national accounts aggregates; useful for definitions and the national accounts framework.
Download dataset & charts (Nominal GDP 2025)
ZIP archive includes the Top 100 table (CSV/XLSX) and ready-to-use PNG charts for this ranking.