Top 50 Countries by Phosphate Rock Mine Production, 2025
2025 Edition Snapshot: Who Mines the Most Phosphate Rock (Latest Reported Year: 2023)
This ranking measures phosphate rock mine production, reported in metric tonnes (here shown as million tonnes, Mt). Phosphate rock is the primary feedstock for phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizers, so production concentration matters for food supply chains, trade balances, and price volatility in agricultural inputs. The page is labeled “2025 edition” because it uses the latest consolidated global compilation available at publication time; the country ranking itself is for 2023.
| Rank | Country | Value (Mt) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | 105.3 |
| 2 | Morocco | 28.7 |
| 3 | United States | ≈19.6 |
| 4 | Russia | ≈14.4 |
| 5 | Peru | 11.9 |
| 6 | Jordan | 11.5 |
| 7 | Saudi Arabia | ≈9.9 |
| 8 | Brazil | ≈4.2 |
| 9 | Egypt | ≈4.0 |
| 10 | Tunisia | 3.1 |
Bar chart shows 2023 phosphate rock mine production (Mt); values marked ≈ are estimated/provisional and rounded for comparability.
Quick read: output is highly concentrated. The top two producers alone (China and Morocco) account for a dominant share of global mining, and the “next tier” is limited to a small set of countries with large, export-relevant deposits.
Why the Ranking Looks Like This: Regions, Industry Links, and Trade Exposure
The distribution is not “random geology”: phosphate mining is dominated by a small set of basins that combine large reserves, workable ore grades, and infrastructure that can move bulk rock into fertilizer and chemical value chains. In practice, global supply separates into three broad groups: mega-producers (China and Morocco), a strategic second tier (United States, Russia, Peru, Jordan, Saudi Arabia), and a long tail of regional suppliers.
A key pattern is the MENA corridor: Morocco, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Israel, and (in smaller volumes) Syria and Algeria appear in the producer list. This matters because many importing regions are simultaneously large fertilizer consumers, so trade flows can tighten quickly when logistics or policy constraints emerge. Another visible cluster is Latin America (Peru, Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Venezuela), where production often supports domestic fertilizer demand but can also become an export buffer depending on local processing capacity and transport costs.
The “long tail” producers are economically important at national scale even when global volumes are small (for example, island production such as Christmas Island or Nauru, and smaller volumes in Finland, Tanzania, Sri Lanka, or Zimbabwe). These entries are useful for understanding regional import dependence: Europe’s agricultural system, for instance, is far more exposed to imported phosphate inputs than the mine geography alone would suggest.
Table 2 lists every country with a reported 2023 production value in the underlying global compilation (34 producers). Values shown as ≈ reflect estimated or provisional figures.
| Rank | Country | Value (Mt, 2023) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | 105.309 |
| 2 | Morocco | 28.675 |
| 3 | United States | ≈19.600 |
| 4 | Russia | ≈14.400 |
| 5 | Peru | 11.920 |
| 6 | Jordan | 11.454 |
| 7 | Saudi Arabia | ≈9.900 |
| 8 | Brazil | ≈4.200 |
| 9 | Egypt | ≈4.000 |
| 10 | Tunisia | 3.093 |
| 11 | Viet Nam | ≈2.983 |
| 12 | Senegal | 2.849 |
| 13 | Israel | 2.308 |
| 14 | Australia | 2.263 |
| 15 | Algeria | ≈1.800 |
| 16 | South Africa | 1.720 |
| 17 | Kazakhstan | 1.676 |
| 18 | India | 1.647 |
| 19 | Togo | 1.517 |
| 20 | Turkey | 1.271 |
| 21 | Finland | 0.906 |
| 22 | Syria | ≈0.800 |
| 23 | Christmas Island | 0.558 |
| 24 | Uzbekistan | 0.534 |
| 25 | Mexico | 0.439 |
| 26 | Nauru | ≈0.260 |
| 27 | Pakistan | ≈0.190 |
| 28 | Mali | 0.100 |
| 29 | Iran | ≈0.090 |
| 30 | Venezuela | ≈0.070 |
| 31 | Sri Lanka | 0.047 |
| 32 | Tanzania | 0.032 |
| 33 | Chile (phosphate rock + guano) | ≈0.010 |
| 34 | Zimbabwe | 0.006 |
Scatter compares 2023 mine production (Mt) vs most recent GDP per capita (current US$, 2024) for the top producers; GDP per capita is used as a scale proxy, not a causal driver.
The scatter usually produces two takeaways. First, high production appears in both middle-income and high-income contexts: large output is possible when deposits are high-quality and infrastructure is in place, regardless of income level. Second, some of the most important exporters sit in a narrow income band but have outsized leverage because phosphate rock is bulky and costly to substitute quickly. That combination tends to amplify the role of logistics (ports, rail, energy costs) and policy (royalties, export rules, fertilizer subsidies) in shaping real-world availability.
Interpretation: What This Concentration Means for Food Systems and Policy
Phosphate rock is a strategic bulk mineral because it sits near the start of the fertilizer chain and has limited short-run substitutability. Farmers ultimately respond to total nutrient economics (N–P–K), but the “P” component is constrained by mining geography and processing capacity. When the top producers tighten export availability, the transmission into global markets is rarely instantaneous; instead it shows up through freight, intermediates (phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizers), and procurement risk premiums.
The ranking also highlights a structural difference between production and supply security. A country can appear as a mid-tier producer yet remain import-exposed if domestic demand grows faster than mines and processing plants can expand. Conversely, export-oriented producers can become pivotal even if their GDP size is modest, because phosphate rock is heavy, moves in large parcels, and depends on stable logistics. In practice, this makes fertilizer affordability sensitive to shipping constraints, energy prices, and trade policy in a handful of corridors.
Finally, concentration does not automatically imply “scarcity,” but it does imply coordination and resilience challenges. Scaling mining output is capital-intensive and can be slowed by permitting, water constraints, tailings management, and community impacts. That means short-term shocks are often managed on the demand side (inventory drawdowns, fertilizer substitution, agronomy changes) rather than through rapid new mine supply.
| Group (2023) | Production (Mt) | Share of total |
|---|---|---|
| Top 3 (China, Morocco, United States) | 153.6 | 64.9% |
| Top 5 (+ Russia, Peru) | 179.9 | 76.0% |
| Top 10 (full Table 1 set) | 212.6 | 89.8% |
| Rest (other reported producers) | 24.1 | 10.2% |
Concentration is high: in this dataset, the top 3 producers provide roughly two-thirds of total output, and the top 10 account for almost nine-tenths. That profile is consistent with a steep cumulative “Pareto-style” curve even without plotting a separate chart.
- Diversification matters more than marginal volume: small additions across multiple jurisdictions can reduce shock sensitivity more than one mega-project in a single corridor.
- Processing capacity is a bottleneck: mined rock is only part of supply security; phosphoric acid and fertilizer conversion capacity can be the binding constraint.
- Logistics is a “hidden variable”: ports, rail, and energy costs can tighten effective supply even when mines operate normally.
- Inventory strategy is a real policy lever: procurement timing and buffer stocks can smooth seasonal demand when market access tightens.
- Environmental constraints shape the medium term: water use, waste management, and permitting timelines influence how quickly new supply can scale.
Primary data sources and technical notes
British Geological Survey (BGS) — World Mineral Production 2019–2023; phosphate rock table used for 2023 country values (some entries marked as estimates).
https://www2.bgs.ac.uk/downloads/start.cfm?id=3935USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries — Phosphate Rock (country-level and market notes; useful for triangulation and definitions).
https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2025/mcs2025-phosphate.pdfWorld Bank Open Data — GDP per capita (current US$), used as “most recent” scale indicator in Chart C.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CDTotals and concentration shares in Table 3 are computed from the same reported-producer list (Table 2). If a producer is unreported in the compilation, it does not enter the total used for shares.
https://data.worldbank.org/Download: Tables & Charts (Phosphate Rock Mine Production — 2025 Edition)
Archive includes CSV + XLSX tables and PNG charts used in this ranking (Top 10 bar, Pareto curve, scatter, concentration shares).
Format: ZIP