TOP 10 Countries by Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) at Birth (2025)
TOP 10 Countries by Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) at Birth (2025)
Based on the latest available WHO Global Health Observatory estimates of healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth (years), processed by Our World in Data and other official sources (most recent data years up to 2021). Figures below are rounded and slightly stylised; for official country values readers should always refer to the WHO data repository.
What is healthy life expectancy (HALE) and why it matters
Healthy life expectancy at birth (HALE) measures the average number of years a newborn can expect to live in full health, after adjusting for time spent in poorer health due to disease or injury. Unlike conventional life expectancy, which only counts years lived, HALE subtracts “years lived with disability” using burden-of-disease estimates. This makes it a compact metric that captures both how long people live and how healthy those years are.
The gap between ordinary life expectancy and HALE shows how many years, on average, people spend with significant health limitations. In many high-income countries this gap is roughly 9–11 years, but the difference can be larger in places with higher rates of chronic disease, disability or weak access to care.
In this ranking we focus on the latest WHO-based estimates available by 2025, with most data points referring to 2019–2021. The countries below are those with the highest HALE at birth for both sexes combined.
Key global patterns in HALE
- The global average HALE at birth is a little below 64 years, significantly lower than global life expectancy, which is above 73 years. Most people spend around a decade in poorer health at the end of life.
- In the top 10 countries, HALE reaches around 73–76 years, roughly 10 years higher than the global average.
- Small, high-income health systems with universal coverage, strong primary care and low midlife mortality dominate the ranking: Singapore, Japan, Spain, Switzerland, Republic of Korea, Italy, Iceland, Australia, Norway and Israel.
- In every country women enjoy a higher HALE than men, but they also tend to spend more absolute years in poor health because their overall life expectancy is higher.
Table 1. Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth in the TOP 10 countries
Approximate HALE at birth in years, latest available WHO-based estimates (around 2019–2021). “M/F” shows male vs. female healthy life expectancy; “Both sexes” is the population average. Values are rounded and slightly stylised for readability.
| Country (ranked by HALE) | HALE at birth, M/F (years, approx.) | HALE, both sexes (years, approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | ≈74.6 (male) / ≈78.0 (female) | ≈76.3 |
| Japan | ≈73.3 / ≈76.7 | ≈75.0 |
| Spain | ≈72.9 / ≈76.3 | ≈74.6 |
| Switzerland | ≈72.7 / ≈76.1 | ≈74.4 |
| Republic of Korea | ≈72.4 / ≈75.8 | ≈74.1 |
| Italy | ≈72.2 / ≈75.6 | ≈73.9 |
| Iceland | ≈72.2 / ≈75.6 | ≈73.9 |
| Australia | ≈72.1 / ≈75.5 | ≈73.8 |
| Norway | ≈72.0 / ≈75.4 | ≈73.7 |
| Israel | ≈71.9 / ≈75.3 | ≈73.6 |
Note: The figures above are approximate, based on WHO Global Health Observatory estimates as compiled by Our World in Data and other official sources (latest data around 2019–2021). They are rounded and slightly stylised and may differ from the exact official values. For analysis or policy work users should always download the original WHO/OWID data.
Visualising healthy life expectancy in the TOP 10
The charts below show how healthy life expectancy (HALE) evolved over time in leading countries and how it compares with conventional life expectancy at birth. Together, they highlight both the long-term progress and the remaining years spent in poor health even in the best-performing systems.
Figure 1. Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth, 2000–2021
Stylised time series for selected high-HALE countries (Singapore, Japan, Spain, Switzerland) compared to the global average. Values follow the general pattern of WHO estimates but are smoothed and rounded for clarity.
Figure 2. HALE vs. life expectancy at birth in the top 10 (approx., latest data)
Grouped bars show approximate healthy life expectancy (HALE) and conventional life expectancy for each country. The difference between the two indicates the average number of years lived in poorer health.
Across these visualisations, global HALE rises steadily but remains well below the levels observed in the top 10 countries. At the same time, the bar chart makes clear that even leaders still face 8–11 years of life in less-than-full health, underlining the importance of prevention, rehabilitation and age-friendly environments.
What do the healthiest countries have in common?
Although each of the ten countries has its own institutional history, several structural factors appear again and again in places with the highest healthy life expectancy:
- Universal health coverage and strong primary care. All of the leaders combine broad population coverage with a strong emphasis on early detection and continuous management of chronic disease. Robust primary care limits complications that lead to prolonged disability.
- Low mid-life mortality from NCDs. Countries such as Japan, Spain and Israel have relatively low rates of premature death from cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. This translates into more years lived to older ages and a higher share of those years in good health.
- Favourable social determinants of health. High incomes, lower poverty, higher educational attainment and strong social safety nets reduce exposure to harmful working conditions, environmental risks and catastrophic out-of-pocket spending on health.
- Health-conscious lifestyles and environments. Diet patterns (for example, Mediterranean diets in Spain and Italy, or traditional diets in Japan), low smoking prevalence in recent cohorts and opportunities for physical activity support healthy ageing.
- Data systems and governance. High-performing systems invest in health information, screening registries and continuous quality improvement. This allows them to respond faster to new risks and to target interventions to groups with the largest health gaps.
These drivers are important not only for increasing life expectancy but particularly for keeping the additional years as healthy as possible. For countries looking to close the HALE gap, investing in primary care, prevention and equitable access to services is usually more effective than focusing only on hospital-based treatment at very old ages.
Policy implications and data limitations
HALE is a useful high-level summary indicator, but it comes with important caveats. It relies on modelling of years lived with disability, which depends on the completeness of disease and disability data, assumptions about severity weights, and the quality of mortality statistics. Uncertainties tend to be larger in low-income countries with weaker vital registration systems.
Moreover, a country’s position in the ranking may shift slightly between updates as WHO refines its models or integrates new data. Therefore, the exact order of the top 10 should not be over-interpreted. What is more robust is the pattern that: high-income countries with strong primary care and effective NCD prevention consistently cluster at the top.
For practitioners, HALE is best used alongside more granular indicators: cause-specific mortality, incidence of major chronic diseases, functional health measures and self-reported health status. Together, these metrics can guide the design of interventions that not only extend life, but also compress morbidity—shifting disability and frailty to the very end of the lifespan.
Data sources and methodology
The figures in this article are based on official international datasets. For precise country values and methodological details, please refer to the original sources below.
-
WHO – Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory.
Indicator “Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth (years)” and related metadata.
https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/gho-ghe-hale-healthy-life-expectancy-at-birth -
WHO – Life expectancy and HALE (GHE theme)
Global Health Estimates section with time series for life expectancy and healthy life expectancy by country and region (2000–2021).
https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-life-expectancy-and-healthy-life-expectancy -
WHO – Global Health Estimates (mortality and morbidity)
WHO Global Health Estimates (GHE) database with deaths, DALYs and years lived with disability (YLDs) by cause, age, sex and country, 2000–2021.
https://www.who.int/data/global-health-estimates -
WHO – World Health Statistics (annual report)
World Health Organization, “World health statistics 2023: monitoring health for the SDGs” and subsequent updates, providing global and regional time series for life expectancy, HALE and related indicators.
https://www.who.int/data/gho/publications/world-health-statistics -
Our World in Data – Healthy life expectancy
Our World in Data data explorer “Healthy life expectancy at birth”, using WHO GHO HALE estimates (2000–2021) with downloadable CSV series and charts.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/healthy-life-expectancy-at-birth -
Our World in Data – Life expectancy and burden of disease (background)
Analytical pages providing context for trends in life expectancy, healthy life expectancy and years lived with disability.
https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy
https://ourworldindata.org/burden-of-disease
Note: The country values and time series in the article are lightly rounded and smoothed for visual clarity. For formal analysis, policy design or academic work, always use the original downloadable datasets from WHO and Our World in Data.
All data tables (CSV) and PNG chart images used in this ranking are available in a single ZIP archive: healthy_life_expectancy_top10_2025_assets.zip.