Countries by PISA Math Scores: Latest Ranking
Countries and Economies by PISA Math Scores: Top 81 Latest OECD Ranking
Singapore ranks first in the OECD PISA mathematics ranking with 575 points. Macao (China) follows with 552 points, and Chinese Taipei ranks third with 547 points. The ranking compares the mean mathematics performance of 15-year-old students across participating education systems.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!This page uses a Top 81 ranking because the current complete OECD PISA mathematics table reports 81 participating countries, economies and selected subnational education systems with published scores. It does not add countries without a reported mathematics result.
The table uses published OECD PISA 2022 mathematics results only. Scores are shown in PISA points, and higher values rank higher.
Continue exploring
More StatRanker rankings on education outcomes, students and learning benchmarks.
Top 80 Countries by PISA Science Scores, 2026 Snapshot
Open rankingTop Countries by PISA Reading Scores
Open rankingTOP 10 Countries by Tertiary Education Attainment (25–64, 2025)
Open rankingSingapore leads the OECD PISA mathematics score table.
Cambodia is the lowest-scoring published entry in this ranking.
The ranking includes countries, economies and selected subnational systems reported by PISA.
The OECD average mathematics score is used as the main comparison reference.
Overview: what the PISA math ranking measures
PISA mathematics performance measures how well 15-year-old students can use mathematical knowledge and reasoning to solve real-world problems. It is not a national school-leaving exam, a curriculum test for one grade or a ranking of universities.
The table ranks countries and economies by their mean mathematics score. Scores are reported on the PISA scale in points. Because PISA is a sample-based assessment, small differences between nearby rows should be read carefully, especially when rounded scores are equal or close.
The ranking follows the OECD reporting structure. It includes entries such as Hong Kong (China), Macao (China), Chinese Taipei, Baku (Azerbaijan) and Ukrainian regions covered by the assessment, so it is better understood as a countries-and-economies ranking than as a sovereign-country-only list.
Top 10 PISA math scores
The upper end of the ranking is led by Asian education systems, followed by high-performing OECD members in Europe and North America. Singapore is 23 points above Macao (China), while the top six entries all score above 527 points.
Top 10 countries and economies by PISA mathematics score
| Rank | Entity | Score | Band / note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singapore | 575 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 2 | Macao (China) | 552 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 3 | Chinese Taipei | 547 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 4 | Hong Kong (China) | 540 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 5 | Japan | 536 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 6 | Korea | 527 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 7 | Estonia | 510 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 8 | Switzerland | 508 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 9 | Canada | 497 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 10 | Netherlands | 493 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
Bands are OECD statistical comparison bands against the OECD average of 472 points. Caution flags indicate that OECD advises extra care when interpreting the estimate.
Chart: Top 20 PISA math scores
The chart uses the same score values as the ranking table. It shows a very high leading score for Singapore and a tight high-performing cluster from Macao (China) through Finland.
Methodology
The ranking uses PISA 2022 mathematics results for 15-year-old students. Scores are measured in PISA points, and rows are sorted from higher score to lower score.
Why OECD PISA is used
The score values come from OECD PISA 2022 Results, Volume I and the OECD PISA 2022 Database. These sources are used for the scores and comparison bands.
Coverage rule
Only countries, economies and selected subnational systems with a published mathematics mean score are included. Aggregates and entries without a published mathematics score are excluded.
How to read close scores
PISA is sample-based, so close ranks should not be overread. Equal rounded scores are ordered by the source table sequence; they do not prove a meaningful performance gap.
Comparison bands
The band filter uses OECD statistical comparison groups: statistically above the OECD average, not statistically different from the OECD average and statistically below the OECD average.
PISA scores summarize one assessed outcome: mathematics performance among 15-year-old students. They do not measure the entire education system, curriculum breadth, university readiness, adult skills, school funding, student well-being or workforce strength.
Differences between countries can reflect curriculum emphasis, equity in learning opportunities, socioeconomic gaps, language and migration patterns, learning disruption, school system structure and sampling context. The table shows outcomes and should be read alongside that wider context.
For entries with caution flags, OECD advises extra care because one or more sampling standards or data-quality conditions require attention. The ranking keeps the published score but signals the interpretation risk in the note column.
Main ranking: Top 81 countries and economies by PISA math score
Use the controls to search by country or education system, filter by OECD statistical band, change sort order or switch between Top 10, Top 20 and all 81 rows.
Top 81 PISA mathematics scores, OECD PISA 2022
| Rank | Entity | Score | Band / note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singapore | 575 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 2 | Macao (China) | 552 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 3 | Chinese Taipei | 547 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 4 | Hong Kong (China) | 540 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 5 | Japan | 536 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 6 | Korea | 527 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 7 | Estonia | 510 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 8 | Switzerland | 508 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 9 | Canada | 497 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 10 | Netherlands | 493 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 11 | Ireland | 492 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 12 | Belgium | 489 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 13 | Denmark | 489 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 14 | United Kingdom | 489 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 15 | Poland | 489 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 16 | Austria | 487 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 17 | Australia | 487 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 18 | Czech Republic | 487 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 19 | Slovenia | 485 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 20 | Finland | 484 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 21 | Latvia | 483 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 22 | Sweden | 482 | Statistically above OECD average. |
| 23 | New Zealand | 479 | Statistically above OECD average; caution flag. |
| 24 | Lithuania | 475 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 25 | Germany | 475 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 26 | France | 474 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 27 | Spain | 473 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 28 | Hungary | 473 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 29 | Portugal | 472 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 30 | Italy | 471 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 31 | Viet Nam | 469 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 32 | Norway | 468 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 33 | Malta | 466 | Not statistically different from OECD average. |
| 34 | United States | 465 | Not statistically different from OECD average; caution flag. |
| 35 | Slovak Republic | 464 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 36 | Croatia | 463 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 37 | Iceland | 459 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 38 | Israel | 458 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 39 | Türkiye | 453 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 40 | Brunei Darussalam | 442 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 41 | Ukrainian regions (18 of 27) | 441 | Statistically below OECD average; subnational coverage. |
| 42 | Serbia | 440 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 43 | United Arab Emirates | 431 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 44 | Greece | 430 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 45 | Romania | 428 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 46 | Kazakhstan | 425 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 47 | Mongolia | 425 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 48 | Cyprus | 418 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 49 | Bulgaria | 417 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 50 | Moldova | 414 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 51 | Qatar | 414 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 52 | Chile | 412 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 53 | Uruguay | 409 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 54 | Malaysia | 409 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 55 | Montenegro | 406 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 56 | Baku (Azerbaijan) | 397 | Statistically below OECD average; subnational entry. |
| 57 | Mexico | 395 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 58 | Thailand | 394 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 59 | Peru | 391 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 60 | Georgia | 390 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 61 | Saudi Arabia | 389 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 62 | North Macedonia | 389 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 63 | Costa Rica | 385 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 64 | Colombia | 383 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 65 | Brazil | 379 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 66 | Argentina | 378 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 67 | Jamaica | 377 | Statistically below OECD average; caution flag. |
| 68 | Albania | 368 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 69 | Palestinian Authority | 366 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 70 | Indonesia | 366 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 71 | Morocco | 365 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 72 | Uzbekistan | 364 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 73 | Jordan | 361 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 74 | Panama | 357 | Statistically below OECD average; caution flag. |
| 75 | Kosovo | 355 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 76 | Philippines | 355 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 77 | Guatemala | 344 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 78 | El Salvador | 343 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 79 | Dominican Republic | 339 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 80 | Paraguay | 338 | Statistically below OECD average. |
| 81 | Cambodia | 336 | Statistically below OECD average. |
Values are rounded PISA score points. Ranks are based on the mathematics mean score, descending. Equal rounded scores should be read as ties in practical terms unless OECD statistical testing shows a difference.
Insights from the PISA math ranking
Key insight
Singapore is the clear leader at 575 points, 23 points above Macao (China) and 28 points above Chinese Taipei.
Notable pattern
The top six are Asian education systems: Singapore, Macao (China), Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong (China), Japan and Korea.
OECD comparison bands
The ranking has 23 entries statistically above the OECD average, 11 not statistically different from it and 47 statistically below it.
Outlier
The spread between the highest and lowest published scores is 239 points, from Singapore at 575 to Cambodia at 336.
What this ranking means for readers
This ranking helps compare mathematics performance among 15-year-old students across participating education systems. It is useful for seeing broad performance levels, but it should not be treated as a full judgment on every part of an education system.
A high PISA math score does not mean that every student performs strongly. National averages can hide gaps by income, region, school type, gender, language background, immigrant background and access to learning support.
Score differences should be read with statistical uncertainty in mind. A large gap, such as Singapore’s lead over the OECD average, is easier to interpret than small differences between neighboring rows or entries with the same rounded score.
The ranking also mixes countries, economies and selected subnational systems because PISA reports them that way. That makes the table faithful to OECD reporting, but it should not be mistaken for a sovereign-country-only education ranking.
FAQ
Which country or economy has the highest PISA math score?
Singapore ranks first in the OECD PISA mathematics table with a mean score of 575 points.
What year does the latest PISA math ranking use?
The ranking uses PISA 2022. PISA 2025 should not be used as a ranking until the official results are published.
What does a PISA math score mean?
It is the mean score of 15-year-old students on the PISA mathematics scale. It reflects performance on tasks designed to measure mathematical reasoning and problem solving.
Why are Hong Kong, Macao, Chinese Taipei and Baku included?
PISA reports participating countries, economies and some subnational education systems separately. This table follows that OECD reporting structure.
Are small score differences meaningful?
Not always. PISA is sample-based, and rounded mean scores can be close or equal. Neighboring ranks should be interpreted together with OECD statistical comparisons and sampling notes.
What does the OECD caution flag mean?
A caution flag means OECD advises extra care when interpreting the estimate because one or more sampling standards or data-quality conditions require attention.
Does the ranking measure the whole education system?
No. It measures one assessed outcome: mathematics performance of 15-year-old students. It does not directly measure early childhood education, higher education, adult skills, school safety or student well-being.
Why do countries and economies differ in PISA math scores?
Differences can reflect curriculum, teaching quality, equity, socioeconomic gaps, learning disruption, language background, assessment participation and sampling context. The table shows outcomes, not every cause behind them.
Sources
OECD PISA 2022 Results, Volume I
Main publication for mathematics results, OECD average, score interpretation and caution notes. Accessed July 5, 2026.
OECD PISA 2022 Database
OECD page with PISA 2022 data files and supporting materials used to verify the ranking values. Accessed July 5, 2026.
OECD PISA Dashboard
Reference tool for exploring PISA indicators and comparing student performance across countries and economies. Accessed July 5, 2026.
NCES PISA Schedule and Plans
Reference for the PISA 2025 publication schedule, supporting the use of PISA 2022 for this ranking. Accessed July 5, 2026.
Related rankings
More StatRanker rankings on education outcomes, students and learning benchmarks.
Top 80 Countries by PISA Science Scores, 2026 Snapshot
Open rankingTop Countries by PISA Reading Scores
Open rankingTOP 10 Countries by Tertiary Education Attainment (25–64, 2025)
Open rankingTOP 10 Countries by Share of Population with Tertiary Education (25–64, 2025)
Open rankingStatRanker (Website)
administrator